From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757073Ab0FIJ3K (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 05:29:10 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:53026 "EHLO mail-px0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756781Ab0FIJ3I (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 05:29:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=cyiDCWyK1er9WsvrYzlpQ2D8tlmqmwEKsLYXW17fJSh5fTUXPyIYhaPUUAXkcoyC6h KGG1Vgo1m0CfZcRzPD4j14f01NxPbz3SbwDbTR5/fu0pWnZwDc+BVzCwXEIKY2qhYqOG G9VOJbqfFSwQz0dOuScgBCZIsJwmyMyOJaWD0= Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:32:57 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Toralf =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=B6rster?= , uml-devel , linux-kernel , Jeff Dike , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash Message-ID: <20100609093257.GA6292@cr0.nay.redhat.com> References: <4C0F4B00.4090307@panasas.com> <4C0F4C40.5020207@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> From: Borislav Petkov >>> >>> Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery >>> introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d >>> (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127522065202435&w=2 >>> >>> Redirect arch_hweight.h include from the x86 portion to the generic >>> arch_hweight.h which is a fallback to the software hweight routines. >>> >>> LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> >>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > >Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > >> who's going to push this ASAP. I was just (again) 3/4 through a bisect >> on 2.6.35-rc2. When I finally realized "Hey that patch, I forgot". >> (My concentration is not what it used to be) >> >> Please push this, someone > >Peter, are you happy with this? >Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a >regression in post-2.6.34. > Usually Andrew should take UML patches.