public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Massey <bart@cs.pdx.edu>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GSoC project: Improving kconfig using a SAT solver
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:55:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610135517.GA4514@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1005172258360.27232@asgard.lang.hm>

Hi!

> >>Even if the problem is different from zypper's, it is also here
> >>possible to get an unsatisfiable instance. You are right that, yes,
> >>the kconfig files on their own should always be satisfiable. But
> >>that's before the user has made any choices at all. An example of an
> >>unsatisfiable instance would be one where the user demands that 1.
> >>some USB driver is enabled, while 2. USB support in general is
> >>disabled.
> >
> >Actually, these are two separate problems.  The first is basic
> >consistency within the Kconfig subsytstem (something that select
> >currently damages for us).  The second is what to present to the user,
> >which is where the inception of the select problem came from.  A user
> >doesn't really want to know that USB device X depends on usb storage,
> >SCSI and a raft of other things ... they just want it to configure a
> >kernel that supports their device.  In particular, we don't want to
> >present every possible option to users and then try to work out a
> >solution, we really need guided configuration (which, in some measure,
> >is what we have today: if you don't select general USB, you won't see
> >any USB drivers.  Or more importantly, if you select an Adaptec SCSI
> >card, we just enable whichever transport library it needs).
> 
> There are two modes people can be in when configuring a kernel.
> 
> 1. I want to configure a kernel to support my hardware, enable
> anything else needed to make it work.
> 
> 2. I really care about having a small kernel, don't enable anything
> I have disabled (but help me figure out why something I want isn't
> available)

There are more...

...part of the problem is that kconfig is both user-dependend (what
filesystems do I use) and machine dependend (what does hw need).

Current defconfig system is unfortunately not quite there :-(.

What would be nice for machines like Sharp Zaurus (spitz) would be
defconfig which answered =Y for hardware spitz definitely has (sound),
=N for hardware that can't be connected (anything pci), and something
different (=M?)  for hardware that can be connected to it
(pcmcia)... leaving 'user' options like filesystems configured ... up
to the user.
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-10 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-17 12:02 [ANNOUNCE] GSoC project: Improving kconfig using a SAT solver Vegard Nossum
2010-05-17 12:13 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-17 13:09   ` Vegard Nossum
2010-05-17 13:21     ` James Bottomley
2010-05-17 14:21       ` Vegard Nossum
2010-05-17 14:28         ` James Bottomley
2010-05-18  6:03           ` david
2010-05-18 12:26             ` Jon Smirl
2010-05-18 12:54               ` Vegard Nossum
2010-05-18 13:42                 ` kevin granade
2010-06-10 13:55             ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2010-05-17 14:18     ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-19 11:05 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-05-19 18:31   ` Vegard Nossum
2010-05-21 11:07     ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100610135517.GA4514@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bart@cs.pdx.edu \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox