From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: "David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
casey@schaufler-ca.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
matthew.dodd@sparta.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
bfields@fieldses.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Security: Add Hook to test if the particular xattr is part of a MAC model.
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:48:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610224845.GA27104@hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276014176-20315-3-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
Quoting David P. Quigley (dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov):
> There are areas in the Labeled NFS code where where we need to test if the
> attribute being requested exhibits the semantics of a MAC model. This allows us
> to make sure that we get the desired semantics from the attribute instead of
> something else such as capabilities or a time based LSM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com>
> Signed-off-by: David P. Quigley <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 11 +++++++++++
> security/capability.c | 6 ++++++
> security/security.c | 6 ++++++
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 6 ++++++
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 4d01784..9597620 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,10 @@ static inline void security_free_mnt_opts(struct security_mnt_opts *opts)
> * @pages contains the number of pages.
> * Return 0 if permission is granted.
> *
> + * @ismaclabel:
> + * Check if the extended attribute specified by @name represents a MAC label.
> + * @name full extended attribute name to check against LSM as a MAC label.
Can you document the return value here? The name does suggestion true/false
rather than success/fail, but it would be nice to have it spelled out without
having to look at one of the implementations to be sure.
Otherwise
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> + *
> * @secid_to_secctx:
> * Convert secid to security context.
> * @secid contains the security ID.
> @@ -1664,6 +1668,7 @@ struct security_operations {
>
> int (*getprocattr) (struct task_struct *p, char *name, char **value);
> int (*setprocattr) (struct task_struct *p, char *name, void *value, size_t size);
> + int (*ismaclabel) (const char * name);
> int (*secid_to_secctx) (u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
> int (*secctx_to_secid) (const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
> void (*release_secctx) (char *secdata, u32 seclen);
> @@ -1919,6 +1924,7 @@ int security_getprocattr(struct task_struct *p, char *name, char **value);
> int security_setprocattr(struct task_struct *p, char *name, void *value, size_t size);
> int security_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> int security_netlink_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, int cap);
> +int security_ismaclabel(const char *name);
> int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
> int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
> void security_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
> @@ -2676,6 +2682,11 @@ static inline int security_netlink_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, int cap)
> return cap_netlink_recv(skb, cap);
> }
>
> +static inline int security_ismaclabel(const char *name)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> diff --git a/security/capability.c b/security/capability.c
> index 9ce1c2f..0d8f7e9 100644
> --- a/security/capability.c
> +++ b/security/capability.c
> @@ -829,6 +829,11 @@ static int cap_setprocattr(struct task_struct *p, char *name, void *value,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int cap_ismaclabel(const char *name)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int cap_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -1064,6 +1069,7 @@ void security_fixup_ops(struct security_operations *ops)
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, d_instantiate);
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, getprocattr);
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, setprocattr);
> + set_to_cap_if_null(ops, ismaclabel);
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, secid_to_secctx);
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, secctx_to_secid);
> set_to_cap_if_null(ops, release_secctx);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index c1b6847..1f0765c 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1013,6 +1013,12 @@ int security_netlink_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, int cap)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_netlink_recv);
>
> +int security_ismaclabel(const char *name)
> +{
> + return security_ops->ismaclabel(name);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_ismaclabel);
> +
> int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> return security_ops->secid_to_secctx(secid, secdata, seclen);
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 435c51f..8239f5c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -5372,6 +5372,11 @@ abort_change:
> return error;
> }
>
> +static int selinux_ismaclabel(const char *name)
> +{
> + return (strcmp(name,XATTR_NAME_SELINUX) == 0);
> +}
> +
> static int selinux_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
> {
> return security_sid_to_context(secid, secdata, seclen);
> @@ -5610,6 +5615,7 @@ static struct security_operations selinux_ops = {
> .getprocattr = selinux_getprocattr,
> .setprocattr = selinux_setprocattr,
>
> + .ismaclabel = selinux_ismaclabel,
> .secid_to_secctx = selinux_secid_to_secctx,
> .secctx_to_secid = selinux_secctx_to_secid,
> .release_secctx = selinux_release_secctx,
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index fdfeaa2..449e223 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -3012,6 +3012,16 @@ static void smack_audit_rule_free(void *vrule)
> #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>
> /**
> + * smack_ismaclabel - check if xattr @name references a smack MAC label
> + * @name: Full xattr name to check.
> + */
> +static int smack_ismaclabel(const char *name)
> +{
> + return (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACK) == 0);
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> * smack_secid_to_secctx - return the smack label for a secid
> * @secid: incoming integer
> * @secdata: destination
> @@ -3199,6 +3209,7 @@ struct security_operations smack_ops = {
> .audit_rule_free = smack_audit_rule_free,
> #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>
> + .ismaclabel = smack_ismaclabel,
> .secid_to_secctx = smack_secid_to_secctx,
> .secctx_to_secid = smack_secctx_to_secid,
> .release_secctx = smack_release_secctx,
> --
> 1.6.2.5
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 16:22 Labeled-NFS: Security Label support in NFSv4 David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] Security: Add hook to calculate context based on a negative dentry David P. Quigley
2010-06-10 22:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-06-11 2:31 ` Casey Schaufler
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] Security: Add Hook to test if the particular xattr is part of a MAC model David P. Quigley
2010-06-10 22:48 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2010-06-11 2:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] LSM: Add flags field to security_sb_set_mnt_opts for in kernel mount data David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] SELinux: Add new labeling type native labels David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] KConfig: Add KConfig entries for Labeled NFS David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and NFSv4 flags David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] NFSv4: Introduce new label structure David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] NFS: Extend NFS xattr handlers to accept the security namespace David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 16:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] NFSD: Server implementation of MAC Labeling David P. Quigley
2010-06-08 23:10 ` Labeled-NFS: Security Label support in NFSv4 J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-07 14:31 David P. Quigley
2010-07-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] Security: Add Hook to test if the particular xattr is part of a MAC model David P. Quigley
2010-07-07 16:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100610224845.GA27104@hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.dodd@sparta.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox