From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with the block trees
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:43:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006141143.42783.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C15F18C.3050905@kernel.dk>
Am Montag, 14. Juni 2010, um 11:08:28 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 2010-06-14 03:26, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jens, Philipp,
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:01:35 +0200 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >> I'm starting to think that it would be a little easier if you did not
> >> pull the drbd tree, I really should be pulling that into my -next branch
> >> instead.
> >
> > Given that the drbd tree has not been updated to match the increasingly
> > different block tree, I have dropped it for today.
> >
> > There a a few possibilities here:
> > - I just drop the drbd tree completely and it only gets merged
> >
> > into the block tree.
> >
> > - if the drbd tree doesn't actually depend on any of the features
> >
> > in the block tree then it could be rebased onto Linus tree (and I would
> > cope with any merge fixups - as I do with many other trees).
> >
> > - if it does depend on things in the block tree, those particular
> >
> > features in the block tree could be put in a separate branch that is
> > never rebased and then that branch could be merged into both the block
> > and drbd trees (this has been done before e.g. stuff in the vfs tree.
> >
> > - the drbd tree could be rebased on tom of the current block tree
> >
> > (but then it must be kept up to date if the block tree is rebased).
>
> The thing with the dependencies is that sometimes they are true,
> sometimes they are not. What I suggested to the drbd team is that they
> always just base off Linus and then ask me to pull their changes, then I
> will resolve any potential conflicts when that happens. The consequence
> would be that you stop pulling the drbd tree separately.
Ok, from now on I will use Linus most recent -rc as base and put DRBD
patches on top of that. -- I will do this today (CEST timezone).
Best,
Phil
--
: Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: Tel: +43-1-8178292-50, Fax: +43-1-8178292-82
: http://www.linbit.com
DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 3:52 linux-next: manual merge of the drbd tree with the block trees Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-10 6:01 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-14 1:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-14 9:08 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-14 9:43 ` Philipp Reisner [this message]
2010-06-14 9:45 ` Jens Axboe
2010-06-14 10:08 ` Philipp Reisner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006141143.42783.philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--to=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox