From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: Salman <sqazi@google.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tytso@google.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, walken@google.com,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately.
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:55:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614185556.afdc5304.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100615005619.GI6666@thunk.org>
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:56:19 -0400 tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:58:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Using
> >
> > grep -r '[ ]cmpxchg[^_]' . | grep -v /arch/
> >
> > I can't see any cmpxchg() callers in truly generic code. lockdep and
> > kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c aren't used on the more remote
> > architectures, I think.
>
> What about:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c: prev = cmpxchg(lock, old, new);
> kernel/lockdep.c: n = cmpxchg(&nr_chain_hlocks, cn, cn + chain->de
I put these in the not-used-on-weird-architectures bucket.
> kernel/sched_clock.c: if (cmpxchg64(&scd->clock, old_clock, clock) != old_cloc
I guess that'll flush out any stragglers.
I suspect sched_clock.c might be generating fair amounts of code which
UP builds don't need.
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: if (cmpxchg(&root->orphan_cleanup_state, 0, ORPHAN_CLEAN
> fs/ext4/inode.c: } while (cmpxchg(&ei->i_flags, old_fl, new_fl) != old_fl
>
> The last is quite new --- I had just recently done a similar set of
> research as you did before accepting the patch that added cmpxchg into
> ext4 (during the last merge window), and I thought cmpxchg() had
> entered the "supported by all architectures" category. It looked like
> it had only recently reached state, but I had reached the conclusion
> that it was safe to use.
I think you're probably right, as long as one sticks with 4-byte
scalars. The cmpxchg-is-now-generic change snuck in under the radar
(mine, at least).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 17:17 [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately Salman
2010-06-11 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-11 22:49 ` Salman
2010-06-11 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-14 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15 0:56 ` tytso
2010-06-15 1:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-06-15 3:26 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-06-15 4:21 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15 4:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15 6:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-06-15 7:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-06-15 12:56 ` tytso
2010-06-15 13:06 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-06-15 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-15 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15 18:35 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately.) Oleg Nesterov
2010-06-15 18:35 ` [PATCH 1/1] pids: alloc_pidmap: remove the unnecessary boundary checks Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-10 21:24 [PATCH] Fix a race in pid generation that causes pids to be reused immediately Salman
2010-06-10 20:09 Salman
2010-06-10 20:38 ` tytso
2010-06-10 21:04 ` Salman Qazi
2010-06-09 21:00 Salman
2010-06-09 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-09 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-10 0:08 ` Salman Qazi
2010-06-10 0:20 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <AANLkTilXJ0X2qxD9cNTlLayKzySEZu1HEZUWu--Go8kw@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-10 5:55 ` Salman Qazi
2010-06-10 16:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 6:24 Salman
2010-06-09 6:53 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-09 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-09 15:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 15:50 ` tytso
2010-06-09 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 17:10 ` tytso
2010-06-09 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 17:34 ` tytso
2010-06-09 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 17:47 ` tytso
2010-06-09 18:09 ` Salman Qazi
2010-06-09 11:49 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-06-09 12:37 ` tytso
2010-06-09 12:17 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100614185556.afdc5304.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sqazi@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox