From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] rename x86 kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:55:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615135520.7B9E71AB@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100615135518.BC244431@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com>
Again, I think this is a poor choice of names. This value truly
means, "the number of pages which _may_ be allocated". But,
reading the value, "n_alloc_mmu_pages", I'm unable to think of
anything it should mean other than "the number of allocated mmu
pages", which is dead wrong.
It's really the high watermark, so let's give it a name to match:
nr_max_mmu_pages. This change will make the next few patches
much more obvious and easy to read.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h~rename-kvm_alloc arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
--- linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h~rename-kvm_alloc 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
unsigned int n_free_mmu_pages;
unsigned int n_requested_mmu_pages;
- unsigned int n_alloc_mmu_pages;
+ unsigned int n_max_mmu_pages;
atomic_t invlpg_counter;
struct hlist_head mmu_page_hash[KVM_NUM_MMU_PAGES];
/*
diff -puN arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c~rename-kvm_alloc arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
--- linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c~rename-kvm_alloc 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages(struct kvm
{
int used_pages;
- used_pages = kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages - kvm_mmu_available_pages(kvm);
+ used_pages = kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages - kvm_mmu_available_pages(kvm);
used_pages = max(0, used_pages);
/*
@@ -1546,9 +1546,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages(struct kvm
}
else
kvm->arch.n_free_mmu_pages += kvm_nr_mmu_pages
- - kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages;
+ - kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages;
- kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages = kvm_nr_mmu_pages;
+ kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages = kvm_nr_mmu_pages;
}
static int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
@@ -2932,7 +2932,7 @@ static int mmu_shrink(int nr_to_scan, gf
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- npages = kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages -
+ npages = kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages -
kvm_mmu_available_pages(kvm);
cache_count += npages;
if (!kvm_freed && nr_to_scan > 0 && npages > 0) {
diff -puN arch/x86/kvm/x86.c~rename-kvm_alloc arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
--- linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c~rename-kvm_alloc 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c 2010-06-09 15:14:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_nr_mmu_pages
static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
{
- return kvm->arch.n_alloc_mmu_pages;
+ return kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages;
}
gfn_t unalias_gfn_instantiation(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 13:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] rework KVM mmu_shrink() code Dave Hansen
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages Dave Hansen
2010-06-16 8:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 13:55 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] replace x86 kvm n_free_mmu_pages with n_used_mmu_pages Dave Hansen
2010-06-16 14:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-16 15:42 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] create aggregate kvm_total_used_mmu_pages value Dave Hansen
2010-06-16 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 15:06 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-17 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-17 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] break out some mmu_skrink() code Dave Hansen
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] remove kvm_freed variable Dave Hansen
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] make kvm_get_kvm() more robust Dave Hansen
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] reduce kvm_lock hold times in mmu_skrink() Dave Hansen
2010-06-16 8:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 13:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] make kvm mmu shrinker more aggressive Dave Hansen
2010-06-16 9:24 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 15:25 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-17 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-18 15:49 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-20 8:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-22 16:32 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-22 4:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-22 5:36 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-22 5:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 8:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] rework KVM mmu_shrink() code Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 15:03 ` Dave Hansen
2010-06-17 8:40 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100615135520.7B9E71AB@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).