From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: always use irq stacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:16:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616051629.GA26012@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100526110923.GA28414@lst.de>
ping? This just came up again as a side-issue in the direct reclaim
thread. x86-32 really is the only one out there still having this
compared to the other common architetures like x86-64, powerpc and s390.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:09:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> IRQ stacks provide much better safety against unexpected stack use from
> interrupts, at the minimal downside of slightly higher memory usage.
> Enable irq stacks also for the default 8k stack to minimize the problem
> of stack overflows through interrupt activity.
>
> This is what x86-64 and various other architectures already do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug 2010-05-25 18:45:43.048276085 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug 2010-05-25 18:45:53.603003841 +0200
> @@ -128,8 +128,7 @@ config 4KSTACKS
> If you say Y here the kernel will use a 4Kb stacksize for the
> kernel stack attached to each process/thread. This facilitates
> running more threads on a system and also reduces the pressure
> - on the VM subsystem for higher order allocations. This option
> - will also use IRQ stacks to compensate for the reduced stackspace.
> + on the VM subsystem for higher order allocations.
>
> config DOUBLEFAULT
> default y
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h 2010-05-25 18:45:43.040025143 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h 2010-05-25 18:45:53.604003981 +0200
> @@ -19,18 +19,16 @@ static inline int irq_canonicalize(int i
> # define ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> - extern void irq_ctx_init(int cpu);
> - extern void irq_ctx_exit(int cpu);
> -# define __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> +extern void irq_ctx_init(int cpu);
> +extern void irq_ctx_exit(int cpu);
> #else
> # define irq_ctx_init(cpu) do { } while (0)
> # define irq_ctx_exit(cpu) do { } while (0)
> -# ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -# define __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
> -# endif
> #endif
>
> +#define __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> extern void fixup_irqs(void);
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c 2010-05-25 18:45:42.981006006 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c 2010-05-25 18:45:53.606003632 +0200
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static inline int check_stack_overflow(v
> static inline void print_stack_overflow(void) { }
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> /*
> * per-CPU IRQ handling contexts (thread information and stack)
> */
> @@ -187,11 +186,6 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> -#else
> -static inline int
> -execute_on_irq_stack(int overflow, struct irq_desc *desc, int irq) { return 0; }
> -#endif
> -
> bool handle_irq(unsigned irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/x86/x86_64/kernel-stacks
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/x86/x86_64/kernel-stacks 2010-05-25 18:45:55.631004120 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/x86/x86_64/kernel-stacks 2010-05-25 18:46:21.785256528 +0200
> @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ specialized stacks contain no useful dat
> Used for external hardware interrupts. If this is the first external
> hardware interrupt (i.e. not a nested hardware interrupt) then the
> kernel switches from the current task to the interrupt stack. Like
> - the split thread and interrupt stacks on i386 (with CONFIG_4KSTACKS),
> - this gives more room for kernel interrupt processing without having
> - to increase the size of every per thread stack.
> + the split thread and interrupt stacks on i386, this gives more room
> + for kernel interrupt processing without having to increase the size
> + of every per thread stack.
>
> The interrupt stack is also used when processing a softirq.
>
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 11:09 [PATCH] x86-32: always use irq stacks Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-26 12:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-26 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-16 5:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-06-16 5:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-16 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-16 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616051629.GA26012@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox