From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758603Ab0FPG2P (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:28:15 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:49514 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755791Ab0FPG2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:28:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:27:48 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: always use irq stacks Message-ID: <20100616062748.GA29543@lst.de> References: <20100526110923.GA28414@lst.de> <20100616051629.GA26012@lst.de> <20100616055609.GC17936@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100616055609.GC17936@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 07:56:09AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > ping? This just came up again as a side-issue in the direct reclaim thread. > > x86-32 really is the only one out there still having this compared to the > > other common architetures like x86-64, powerpc and s390. > > We should also make 8K stacks the default on 32-bit. I.e. remove all the > Kconfig distinctions and make the stack model similar on 32-bit and 64-bit > x86. Sounds fine to me. Do you want an additional patch for that or a respin to include it in one patch?