From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:36:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616143659.GA14616@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilZElLEBJDjfpZVx72uDR-x_3t14Jkga5eHy3wf@mail.gmail.com>
On 12:37 Wed 16 Jun , Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Can you see what they're doing?
> >
> > watch -n0 cat /sys/kernel/debug/slow_work/runqueue
>
> Turned on the debugging and applied the patch from Ted, and when
> things are bad I see constant cycling of all four threads in the
> output showing similar to the below, note only one thread shows at a
> time:
>
> Every 0.1s: cat /sys/kernel/debug/slow_work/runqueue Wed Jun 16 12:34:52 2010
>
> THR PID ITEM ADDR FL MARK DESC
> === ===== ================ == ===== ==========
> 0 897 ffff88012bb07510 12 20ms DRM_CRTC_HELPER: i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
Indeed, this looks very similar to mine, except my DESC field is blank
for some reason. The FL value is sometimes 12, sometimes 2.
When things are bad, all four of the kslowd threads are pegged at 16%
CPU usage. On my T500, they _never_ calm down once they're pegged.
However, things seem to be working normally at boot. It seems that
there is some initial trigger which pegs the threads, then the cursor
lag and other problems are just fallout after that. The system is
essentially unusable after this point.
The threads sometimes get pegged immediately after booting the system,
sometimes it can last an hour or more before showing any problems.
Unfortunately, this is making bisection essentially impossible.
This seems to have been introduced somewhere between 2.6.35-rc1 and
-rc2.
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-16 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 18:36 Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? Theodore Ts'o
2010-06-09 18:56 ` David Howells
2010-06-09 19:00 ` David Howells
2010-06-13 8:23 ` Dave Airlie
2010-06-13 19:49 ` tytso
2010-06-13 20:00 ` Dave Airlie
2010-06-14 18:42 ` Nick Bowler
2010-06-14 21:46 ` tytso
2010-06-15 17:25 ` Andy Whitcroft
2010-06-15 18:07 ` David Howells
2010-06-16 11:37 ` Andy Whitcroft
2010-06-16 13:33 ` Andy Whitcroft
2010-06-16 14:36 ` Nick Bowler [this message]
2010-06-16 14:55 ` Andy Whitcroft
2010-06-17 13:25 ` Nick Bowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100616143659.GA14616@elliptictech.com \
--to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).