From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932641Ab0FPSvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:51:25 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:55469 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932591Ab0FPSvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:51:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:43:55 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Nitin Gupta Cc: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Hugh Dickins , Cyp , driverdev , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zram: generic RAM based compressed R/W block devices Message-ID: <20100616184355.GA14248@kroah.com> References: <1274710685-2351-1-git-send-email-ngupta@vflare.org> <4BFFEA95.9040505@vflare.org> <20100528162657.GA28781@kroah.com> <4C18337C.3040605@vflare.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C18337C.3040605@vflare.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 07:44:20AM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 05/28/2010 09:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:38:53PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > >> > >> On 05/24/2010 07:48 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote: > >>> Creates RAM based block devices: /dev/zramX (X = 0, 1, ...). > >>> Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored in memory > >>> itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides > >>> good amounts of memory savings. > >>> > >>> This is enhancement over existing ramzswap driver which creates > >>> virtual block devices (/dev/ramzswapX) which could be used only > >>> as swap disks. > >>> > >>> Now, with the ability to handle any kind of I/O request, zram > >>> devices have lot more use cases: > >>> - /tmp storage > >>> - various caches under /var > >>> - swap disks > >>> - maybe even more! :) > >>> > >>> Performance numbers can be found at: > >>> http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/zramperf > >>> > >> > >> Any reviews/comments, please? > > > > We are all busy with the .35-rc1 merge work at the moment, sorry. > > > > Can you please apply these patches to linux-next? Yes, I'm working on it, I should get to it by the end of this week. > or maybe for .35-rc3/rc4 too? No, this is not a bugfix, why would it be acceptable for the .35 kernel release? thanks, greg k-h