From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933152Ab0FQRjF (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:39:05 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:46750 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933093Ab0FQRjD (ORCPT >); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:39:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:38:17 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "jeremy@goop.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ddutile@redhat.com" , "sheng@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM Message-ID: <20100617173817.GA17523@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1275570645-27189-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1275570645-27189-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <20100614212040.GC8600@phenom.dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4C1A5DA6.00EE:SCFMA4539811,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > /* vector callbacks are better than PCI interrupts to receive event ^V > * channel notifications because we can receive vector callbacks on any > * vcpu and we don't need PCI support or APIC interactions */ ^. > > is it good enough? Just two things..