* [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id
@ 2010-06-18 6:30 Daniel Sangorrin
2010-06-18 14:37 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Sangorrin @ 2010-06-18 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Mohr; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Radek Liboska, linux-usb, linux-kernel
This patch corrects a problem with the merge of a previous
patch to add the CONTEC identifier.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c | 1 -
drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h | 7 -------
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
index 79dd1ae..da7e334 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
@@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct usb_device_id id_table_combined [] = {
{ USB_DEVICE(EVOLUTION_VID, EVOLUTION_ER1_PID) },
{ USB_DEVICE(EVOLUTION_VID, EVO_HYBRID_PID) },
{ USB_DEVICE(EVOLUTION_VID, EVO_RCM4_PID) },
- { USB_DEVICE(CONTEC_VID, CONTEC_COM1USBH_PID) },
{ USB_DEVICE(FTDI_VID, FTDI_ARTEMIS_PID) },
{ USB_DEVICE(FTDI_VID, FTDI_ATIK_ATK16_PID) },
{ USB_DEVICE(FTDI_VID, FTDI_ATIK_ATK16C_PID) },
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
index 94d86c3..bbc159a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h
@@ -501,13 +501,6 @@
#define CONTEC_COM1USBH_PID 0x8311 /* COM-1(USB)H */
/*
- * Contec products (http://www.contec.com)
- * Submitted by Daniel Sangorrin
- */
-#define CONTEC_VID 0x06CE /* Vendor ID */
-#define CONTEC_COM1USBH_PID 0x8311 /* COM-1(USB)H */
-
-/*
* Definitions for B&B Electronics products.
*/
#define BANDB_VID 0x0856 /* B&B Electronics Vendor ID */
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id
2010-06-18 6:30 [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id Daniel Sangorrin
@ 2010-06-18 14:37 ` Greg KH
2010-06-21 2:08 ` Daniel Sangorrin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-06-18 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Sangorrin; +Cc: Andreas Mohr, Radek Liboska, linux-usb, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:30:02PM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> This patch corrects a problem with the merge of a previous
> patch to add the CONTEC identifier.
What patch had the merge problem? Did I just end up duplicating stuff
incorrectly? What was the git commit id?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id
2010-06-18 14:37 ` Greg KH
@ 2010-06-21 2:08 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2010-06-21 21:18 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Sangorrin @ 2010-06-21 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Andreas Mohr, Radek Liboska, linux-usb, linux-kernel
Hi Greg,
I believe the merge problem occurred with the commit:
dee5658b482e9e2ac7d6205dc876fc11d4008138
Originally I submitted a patch and then they asked me to order the IDs
and resubmit, so did I. But unfortunately in the end somehow both
patches were merged.
[PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
[PATCH resubmit] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
Was I supposed to do the resubmit patch in a way that would unpatch
the first patch? Or is the word resubmit enough to know that this is
the good patch?
Thanks!
Dani
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:30:02PM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
>> This patch corrects a problem with the merge of a previous
>> patch to add the CONTEC identifier.
>
> What patch had the merge problem? Did I just end up duplicating stuff
> incorrectly? What was the git commit id?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id
2010-06-21 2:08 ` Daniel Sangorrin
@ 2010-06-21 21:18 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2010-06-21 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Sangorrin
Cc: Greg KH, Andreas Mohr, Radek Liboska, linux-usb, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:08:19AM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I believe the merge problem occurred with the commit:
>
> dee5658b482e9e2ac7d6205dc876fc11d4008138
>
> Originally I submitted a patch and then they asked me to order the IDs
> and resubmit, so did I. But unfortunately in the end somehow both
> patches were merged.
>
> [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
> [PATCH resubmit] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id
>
> Was I supposed to do the resubmit patch in a way that would unpatch
> the first patch? Or is the word resubmit enough to know that this is
> the good patch?
This is good, I just wanted to know this information as to what went
wrong. I'll put this into the changelog entry.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-21 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-18 6:30 [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: correct merge conflict with CONTEC id Daniel Sangorrin
2010-06-18 14:37 ` Greg KH
2010-06-21 2:08 ` Daniel Sangorrin
2010-06-21 21:18 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox