* perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events
@ 2010-06-24 1:39 Wu Fengguang
2010-06-24 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2010-06-24 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker
Greetings,
I noticed that
# perf stat -e syscalls:sys_enter_mmap true
refuse to work on 2.6.35-rc1. The last working kernel is 2.6.34.
Any suggestions before me jumping into debug?
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events 2010-06-24 1:39 perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events Wu Fengguang @ 2010-06-24 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2010-06-24 5:58 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Wu Fengguang @ 2010-06-24 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: LKML; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:15AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Greetings, > > I noticed that > > # perf stat -e syscalls:sys_enter_mmap true > > refuse to work on 2.6.35-rc1. The last working kernel is 2.6.34. Other events like lock:* or block:* or whatever continue to work. So this is a problem specific to syscalls:*. Thanks, Fengguang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events 2010-06-24 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang @ 2010-06-24 5:58 ` Peter Zijlstra 2010-06-24 6:38 ` Wu Fengguang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-06-24 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wu Fengguang; +Cc: LKML, Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 09:44 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:15AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I noticed that > > > > # perf stat -e syscalls:sys_enter_mmap true > > > > refuse to work on 2.6.35-rc1. The last working kernel is 2.6.34. > > Other events like lock:* or block:* or whatever continue to work. > So this is a problem specific to syscalls:*. Does your tree contain: --- commit a8fb2608053547bc3152ea61a5ec7cdfce5d942c Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jun 10 14:53:16 2010 -0400 perf/tracing: Fix regression of perf losing kprobe events With the addition of the code to shrink the kernel tracepoint infrastructure, we lost kprobes being traced by perf. The reason is that I tested if the "tp_event->class->perf_probe" existed before enabling it. This prevents "ftrace only" events (like the function trace events) from being enabled by perf. Unfortunately, kprobe events do not use perf_probe. This causes kprobes to be missed by perf. To fix this, we add the test to see if "tp_event->class->reg" exists as well as perf_probe. Normal trace events have only "perf_probe" but no "reg" function, and kprobes and syscalls have the "reg" but no "perf_probe". The ftrace unique events do not have either, so this is a valid test. If a kprobe or syscall is not to be probed by perf, the "reg" function is called anyway, and will return a failure and prevent perf from probing it. Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c index e6f6588..8a2b73f 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c @@ -96,7 +96,9 @@ int perf_trace_init(struct perf_event *p_event) mutex_lock(&event_mutex); list_for_each_entry(tp_event, &ftrace_events, list) { if (tp_event->event.type == event_id && - tp_event->class && tp_event->class->perf_probe && + tp_event->class && + (tp_event->class->perf_probe || + tp_event->class->reg) && try_module_get(tp_event->mod)) { ret = perf_trace_event_init(tp_event, p_event); break; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events 2010-06-24 5:58 ` Peter Zijlstra @ 2010-06-24 6:38 ` Wu Fengguang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wu Fengguang @ 2010-06-24 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: LKML, Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:58:45PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 09:44 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:39:15AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I noticed that > > > > > > # perf stat -e syscalls:sys_enter_mmap true > > > > > > refuse to work on 2.6.35-rc1. The last working kernel is 2.6.34. > > > > Other events like lock:* or block:* or whatever continue to work. > > So this is a problem specific to syscalls:*. > > Does your tree contain: Thanks, it worked! This patch is missing from linux-2.6.git for now. Thanks, Fengguang > --- > commit a8fb2608053547bc3152ea61a5ec7cdfce5d942c > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 10 14:53:16 2010 -0400 > > perf/tracing: Fix regression of perf losing kprobe events > > With the addition of the code to shrink the kernel tracepoint > infrastructure, we lost kprobes being traced by perf. The reason > is that I tested if the "tp_event->class->perf_probe" existed before > enabling it. This prevents "ftrace only" events (like the function > trace events) from being enabled by perf. > > Unfortunately, kprobe events do not use perf_probe. This causes > kprobes to be missed by perf. To fix this, we add the test to > see if "tp_event->class->reg" exists as well as perf_probe. > > Normal trace events have only "perf_probe" but no "reg" function, > and kprobes and syscalls have the "reg" but no "perf_probe". > The ftrace unique events do not have either, so this is a valid > test. If a kprobe or syscall is not to be probed by perf, the > "reg" function is called anyway, and will return a failure and > prevent perf from probing it. > > Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > index e6f6588..8a2b73f 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c > @@ -96,7 +96,9 @@ int perf_trace_init(struct perf_event *p_event) > mutex_lock(&event_mutex); > list_for_each_entry(tp_event, &ftrace_events, list) { > if (tp_event->event.type == event_id && > - tp_event->class && tp_event->class->perf_probe && > + tp_event->class && > + (tp_event->class->perf_probe || > + tp_event->class->reg) && > try_module_get(tp_event->mod)) { > ret = perf_trace_event_init(tp_event, p_event); > break; > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-24 6:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-06-24 1:39 perf regression: failed to stat syscalls events Wu Fengguang 2010-06-24 1:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2010-06-24 5:58 ` Peter Zijlstra 2010-06-24 6:38 ` Wu Fengguang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox