From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752279Ab0F2ByM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:54:12 -0400 Received: from LUNGE.MIT.EDU ([18.54.1.69]:46918 "EHLO lunge.queued.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278Ab0F2ByK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:54:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:54:07 -0400 From: Andres Salomon To: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, cjb@laptop.org, Mitch Bradley , pgf@laptop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, grant.likely@secretlab.ca Subject: [PATCH 0/4] RFC: OLPC/x86 device tree code Message-ID: <20100628215407.2017bf2f@debian> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm looking for input on the following patches; they're based upon the OFW patch that's currently in the x86-tip tree[0], and they've only been compile tested (on x86 and sparc64). This stuff takes the sparc device tree creation code and makes it available for multiple architectures, which OLPC then makes use of to build the tree. There's still a bunch of little stuff that I need to fix (and of course, I need to verify that it actually remains compatible w/ the old promfs code that OLPC's been using[1]). [0] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=commit;h=fd699c76552bb [1] http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-2.6/commit/?id=0b9734dc5f0b3d24e8f3dfedaeacb61675c838ff