linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, cjb@laptop.org, Mitch Bradley <wmb@laptop.org>,
	pgf@laptop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:23:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629102339.5e8a30b6@dev.queued.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUy_FGuN9DiF5KtMCsqYUbByfS6g2Mdw0ATvtQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:12:36 -0700
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

> Hi Andres, comments below....

Thanks!


> 
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Make use of PROC_DEVICETREE to export the tree, and sparc's
> > PROMTREE code to call into OLPC's Open Firmware to build the tree.
> >
> > (Yes, I know this leaks memory by simply using kmalloc)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig                 |    5 ++
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h |   42 +++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h      |    5 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile         |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c       |   13 ++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/olpc_prom.c      |  148
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/proc/Kconfig
> >      |    2 +- 7 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/olpc_prom.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 71c194d..7aea004 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2071,6 +2071,11 @@ config OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> >          that is used on the OLPC XO-1 Children's Machine.
> >          If unsure, say N here.
> >
> > +config OF
> > +       def_bool y
> > +       depends on OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> > +       select OF_PROMTREE
> > +
> 
> This hunk will need to be respun on top of Stephen's CONFIG_OF change.
>  It's currently in my test-devicetree branch on
> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6

Yep, I've changed it locally.

> 
> >  endif # X86_32
> >
> >  config K8_NB
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..96cdcee
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> > +#include <linux/of.h>  /* linux/of.h gets to determine #include
> > ordering */ +/*
> > + * Definitions for talking to the Open Firmware PROM on
> > + * Power Macintosh computers.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 1996-2005 Paul Mackerras.
> > + *
> > + * Updates for PPC64 by Peter Bergner & David Engebretsen, IBM
> > Corp.
> > + * Updates for SPARC by David S. Miller
> > + * Updates for x86/OLPC by Andres Salomon
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> > + * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _X86_PROM_OLPC_H
> > +#define _X86_PROM_OLPC_H
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +
> > +#define OF_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT 2
> > +#define OF_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT 1
> 
> Do you really need to override these from the default?
> 
> > +#define of_compat_cmp(s1, s2, l)       strncmp((s1), (s2), (l))
> > +#define of_prop_cmp(s1, s2)            strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
> > +#define of_node_cmp(s1, s2)            strcmp((s1), (s2))
> 
> Ditto here?

They're based upon what the old promfs patch used.  I need to test and
verify that strings are being mangled in the same way before I start
making changes here.


> 
> > +extern void prom_build_devicetree(void);
> > +
> > +extern void *prom_early_alloc(unsigned long size);
> > +
> > +extern char *prom_firstprop(phandle node, char *buf);
> > +extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle node, const char *prev, char
> > *buf); +extern int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *prop);
> > +extern int prom_getproperty(phandle node, const char *prop,
> > +                            char *buffer, int bufsize);
> > +extern phandle prom_getchild(phandle node);
> > +extern phandle prom_getsibling(phandle node);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> > +#endif /* _X86_PROM_OLPC_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7b561b2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> > +# include <asm/olpc_prom.h>
> > +#else
> > +# error "No OFW prom defined for x86!"
> > +#endif
> 
> Personally, I wouldn't bother with the header file redirection.

The reason for the header file redirection is because this is
OLPC-only; the x86 folks don't want me claiming this to be the One
True x86 OFW.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-29 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29  1:54 [PATCH 0/4] RFC: OLPC/x86 device tree code Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  2:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: OLPC: constify an olpc_ofw() arg Andres Salomon
2010-07-31  1:10   ` [tip:x86/olpc] x86, olpc: Constify " tip-bot for Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  2:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] sparc: break out some prom device-tree building code out into drivers/of Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  3:11   ` David Miller
2010-06-29  6:15   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-29  7:50   ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 15:03     ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 21:42       ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 23:36         ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-30 21:52           ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07  4:07             ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06  2:22               ` David Miller
2010-07-06  7:00                 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06  7:16                   ` David Miller
2010-07-06  8:17                     ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07  5:15                 ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06 10:17                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-06  8:17               ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06  9:21   ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06 21:54     ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06 22:06       ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07  1:15         ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  2:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] proc: unify PROC_DEVICETREE config Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  7:33   ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29  2:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support Andres Salomon
2010-06-29  8:12   ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29  8:33     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-29 14:23     ` Andres Salomon [this message]
2010-06-30 21:13       ` Grant Likely
2010-06-30 21:32         ` Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  3:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  3:53   ` [PATCH 1/9] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  5:06     ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-03  8:17       ` Andres Salomon
2010-09-05  6:22         ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-30  3:55   ` [PATCH 2/9] sparc: convert various prom_* functions to use phandle Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  3:57   ` [PATCH 3/9] sparc: break out some PROM device-tree building code out into drivers/of Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  3:59   ` [PATCH 4/9] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  4:00   ` [PATCH 5/9] of: no longer call prom_ functions directly; use an ops structure Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  4:02   ` [PATCH 6/9] of: add of_pdt namespace to pdt code Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  4:04   ` [PATCH 7/9] of: add package-to-path support to pdt Andres Salomon
2010-08-30  4:06   ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: of: irq additions to make drivers/of/* build on x86 Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 15:58     ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2010-08-30 17:31       ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30  4:07   ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 18:14     ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30 18:49       ` Andres Salomon
2010-08-31  5:49         ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30 17:58   ` [PATCH 0/9] " Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100629102339.5e8a30b6@dev.queued.net \
    --to=dilinger@queued.net \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgf@laptop.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wmb@laptop.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).