From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, cjb@laptop.org, Mitch Bradley <wmb@laptop.org>,
pgf@laptop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:23:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100629102339.5e8a30b6@dev.queued.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUy_FGuN9DiF5KtMCsqYUbByfS6g2Mdw0ATvtQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:12:36 -0700
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> Hi Andres, comments below....
Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Make use of PROC_DEVICETREE to export the tree, and sparc's
> > PROMTREE code to call into OLPC's Open Firmware to build the tree.
> >
> > (Yes, I know this leaks memory by simply using kmalloc)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 ++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h | 42 +++++++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h | 5 ++
> > arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c | 13 ++++
> > arch/x86/kernel/olpc_prom.c | 148
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/proc/Kconfig
> > | 2 +- 7 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/olpc_prom.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 71c194d..7aea004 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -2071,6 +2071,11 @@ config OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> > that is used on the OLPC XO-1 Children's Machine.
> > If unsure, say N here.
> >
> > +config OF
> > + def_bool y
> > + depends on OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> > + select OF_PROMTREE
> > +
>
> This hunk will need to be respun on top of Stephen's CONFIG_OF change.
> It's currently in my test-devicetree branch on
> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6
Yep, I've changed it locally.
>
> > endif # X86_32
> >
> > config K8_NB
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..96cdcee
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_prom.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> > +#include <linux/of.h> /* linux/of.h gets to determine #include
> > ordering */ +/*
> > + * Definitions for talking to the Open Firmware PROM on
> > + * Power Macintosh computers.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 1996-2005 Paul Mackerras.
> > + *
> > + * Updates for PPC64 by Peter Bergner & David Engebretsen, IBM
> > Corp.
> > + * Updates for SPARC by David S. Miller
> > + * Updates for x86/OLPC by Andres Salomon
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> > + * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _X86_PROM_OLPC_H
> > +#define _X86_PROM_OLPC_H
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +
> > +#define OF_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT 2
> > +#define OF_ROOT_NODE_SIZE_CELLS_DEFAULT 1
>
> Do you really need to override these from the default?
>
> > +#define of_compat_cmp(s1, s2, l) strncmp((s1), (s2), (l))
> > +#define of_prop_cmp(s1, s2) strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
> > +#define of_node_cmp(s1, s2) strcmp((s1), (s2))
>
> Ditto here?
They're based upon what the old promfs patch used. I need to test and
verify that strings are being mangled in the same way before I start
making changes here.
>
> > +extern void prom_build_devicetree(void);
> > +
> > +extern void *prom_early_alloc(unsigned long size);
> > +
> > +extern char *prom_firstprop(phandle node, char *buf);
> > +extern char *prom_nextprop(phandle node, const char *prev, char
> > *buf); +extern int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *prop);
> > +extern int prom_getproperty(phandle node, const char *prop,
> > + char *buffer, int bufsize);
> > +extern phandle prom_getchild(phandle node);
> > +extern phandle prom_getsibling(phandle node);
> > +
> > +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> > +#endif /* _X86_PROM_OLPC_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7b561b2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
> > +# include <asm/olpc_prom.h>
> > +#else
> > +# error "No OFW prom defined for x86!"
> > +#endif
>
> Personally, I wouldn't bother with the header file redirection.
The reason for the header file redirection is because this is
OLPC-only; the x86 folks don't want me claiming this to be the One
True x86 OFW.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-29 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-29 1:54 [PATCH 0/4] RFC: OLPC/x86 device tree code Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 2:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: OLPC: constify an olpc_ofw() arg Andres Salomon
2010-07-31 1:10 ` [tip:x86/olpc] x86, olpc: Constify " tip-bot for Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 2:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] sparc: break out some prom device-tree building code out into drivers/of Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 3:11 ` David Miller
2010-06-29 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-29 7:50 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 15:03 ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 21:42 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 23:36 ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-30 21:52 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07 4:07 ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06 2:22 ` David Miller
2010-07-06 7:00 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06 7:16 ` David Miller
2010-07-06 8:17 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07 5:15 ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06 10:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-06 8:17 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06 9:21 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-06 21:54 ` Andres Salomon
2010-07-06 22:06 ` Grant Likely
2010-07-07 1:15 ` Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 2:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] proc: unify PROC_DEVICETREE config Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 7:33 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 2:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support Andres Salomon
2010-06-29 8:12 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-29 8:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-29 14:23 ` Andres Salomon [this message]
2010-06-30 21:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-30 21:32 ` Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 3:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/9] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 5:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-09-03 8:17 ` Andres Salomon
2010-09-05 6:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-08-30 3:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] sparc: convert various prom_* functions to use phandle Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] sparc: break out some PROM device-tree building code out into drivers/of Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 3:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 4:00 ` [PATCH 5/9] of: no longer call prom_ functions directly; use an ops structure Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 4:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] of: add of_pdt namespace to pdt code Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 4:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] of: add package-to-path support to pdt Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 4:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: of: irq additions to make drivers/of/* build on x86 Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 15:58 ` Stephen Neuendorffer
2010-08-30 17:31 ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30 4:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support Andres Salomon
2010-08-30 18:14 ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30 18:49 ` Andres Salomon
2010-08-31 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2010-08-30 17:58 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100629102339.5e8a30b6@dev.queued.net \
--to=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pgf@laptop.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wmb@laptop.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).