From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751382Ab0GBELI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:11:08 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:33831 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882Ab0GBELG (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:11:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:11:02 -0400 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [patch 119/149] ext4: check s_log_groups_per_flex in online resize code Message-ID: <20100702041102.GJ1333@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Sandeen References: <20100701175144.GA2116@kroah.com> <20100701173216.846632087@clark.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100701173216.846632087@clark.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:32:25AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > 2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. My only objection to these patches is that I don't know if they are going to cause patch conflicts with the 50 or so patches which I sent you for 2.6.32, which include both this patch and the next one. When I backported the patches I did have to adjust some of them to make sure they would apply cleanly to the latest 2.6.32.X release. By cherry picking them, it could be that dropping those patches from could cause no problems at all; or it could be a bit of a headache. So it might be easier to drop these two and then wait for the next 2.6.32 stable release (which will hopefully be coming soon!) and just take my whole set of patches.... - Ted