From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michael Hennerich <hennerich@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (touchscreen/ad7879)
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:58:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007020958.05448.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100702093944.b0ebe49a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Friday, July 02, 2010 09:39:44 am Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:35:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20100630:
> >
> > The tip tree lost a conflict.
> >
> > The driver-core tree gained a conflict agains the jdelvare-hwmon tree.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
>
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c: In function 'ad7879_probe':
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:487: error: 'struct ad7879' has no
> member named 'mutex' drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:578: warning:
> passing argument 1 of 'ad7879_gpio_add' from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:444: note: expected 'struct device *'
> but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:578: error: too many arguments to
> function 'ad7879_gpio_add' drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:589:
> warning: passing argument 1 of 'ad7879_gpio_remove' from incompatible
> pointer type drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:449: note: expected
> 'struct device *' but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c: In function 'ad7879_remove':
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:604: warning: passing argument 1 of
> 'ad7879_gpio_remove' from incompatible pointer type
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:449: note: expected 'struct device *'
> but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
>
>
> config file is attached.
>
Oops, I will fix that up.
Thanks for the report Randy.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-02 6:35 linux-next: Tree for July 2 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-02 16:39 ` linux-next: Tree for July 2 (touchscreen/ad7879) Randy Dunlap
2010-07-02 16:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2010-07-03 20:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-07-02 23:44 ` [PATCH -next] staging/solo: add delay.h header Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007020958.05448.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hennerich@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox