From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
clemens@ladisch.de, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:35:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702143515.2896d728@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100630235949.GA5120@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:59:49 -0700
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:10:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources
> >
> > Gaah. This still looks like just total ad-hoc hackery. The logic for
> > it all seems very fragile, just a random case made up from the one
> > failing issue. There's no underlying logic or design to it.
> >
> > I still think that we should just make people explicitly ask for a
> > blank slate if the bios allocations don't work out.
>
> and interactively allocate resource?
No I don't think we want to add any prompts to the kernel boot
process. :)
> > Rather than trying
> > to fix it up automatically, which has been a total rats nest of random
> > crud.
>
> Can Yinghai Lu's patch 'pci=try=' be some temporary middle ground till
> a more elaborate patch is found?
>
> His suggestion partly meets your suggestion. It does not automatically
> reassign unless the user explicitly asks for it. Hence should not
> break any working systems, at the same time can handle system like
> mine.
pci=try just doesn't communicate much, it should be something like
pci=override_bios and do as Linus suggests.
But we should continue to shoot for not ever having to use that option
on normal systems.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 21:15 [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources Ram Pai
2010-06-30 22:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-06-30 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-30 23:59 ` Ram Pai
2010-07-02 21:35 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-07-06 23:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07 0:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-07 4:28 ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-07 18:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-07 18:55 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 13:26 ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-09 15:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-09 15:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-07-09 16:00 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100702143515.2896d728@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox