From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759085Ab0GBQLQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:11:16 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:51767 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758967Ab0GBQLO (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:11:14 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: Add driver to enable access to the user dynamic network. Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 18:11:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-19-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <201006252110.o5PLArvw010770@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201006282134.55166.arnd@arndb.de> <4C2DD958.7030005@tilera.com> In-Reply-To: <4C2DD958.7030005@tilera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007021811.04197.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX188sUev5/xx+yACuH9dYxKMtDn8gDAS+OiaDXe kc5YVQu3xAg9EH01kEhLcw0GbELnLAFPMB6PTWbp0v77a9r92p 9s+MN10IfmxT/tNdFVsUQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > So, if there's a good reason for it to be there, I'd say that pushes us > back toward a separate . Otherwise we can > investigate splitting out the prefetch content on every platform to > (presumably creating some empty > headers on architectures that just use the gcc builtin) and adding new > #includes of to files that reference the prefetch > functionality. Arnd and other list folks, what's your instinct? Makes sense. Splitting out the list types from list.h does seem to be safest option. We might actually be able to do some header file untangling that way, by using list_types.h in all headers that use a list_head by none of the macros and functions associated with it. Arnd