public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time/fs - file's time race with vgettimeofday
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:58:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702235836.GA1948@jolsa.Belkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100702161422.GA31733@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:14:22PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> In no way I can review this patch, but I am curious and have the questions.
> Also, I think it makes sense to cc the fs/ developers, I've added Al.

thanks

> 
> On 07/02, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > there's a race among calling gettimeofday(2) and a file's time
> > updates.  Following test program expose the race.
> >
> > run it in the while loop
> > 	while [ 1 ]; do ./test1 || break; done
> >
> > --- SNIP ---
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> >
> > int main (void)
> > {
> > 	struct stat st;
> > 	struct timeval tv;
> >
> > 	unlink("./file");
> >
> > 	gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> >
> > 	if (-1 == creat("./file", O_RDWR)) {
> > 		perror("creat");
> > 		return -1;
> > 	}
> >
> > 	if (stat("./file", &st) != 0) {
> > 		perror("stat");
> > 		return -1;
> > 	}
> >
> > 	printf("USER gtod: %ld\n", (long)tv.tv_sec);
> > 	printf("USER file: %ld.%09u\n",
> > 			(long) st.st_mtime,
> > 			(unsigned) st.st_mtim.tv_nsec);
> >
> > 	return tv.tv_sec <= st.st_mtime ? 0 : -1;
> > }
> 
> Interesting. To the point, I actually compiled this code and yes,
> it triggers the problem on ext3 ;)
> 
> > The following patch will prevent the race by adding the
> > CURRENT_TIME_SEC_REAL macro, which will return seconds from
> > the getnstimeofday call, ensuring it's computed on current tick.
> > It fixes the 'creat' case for ext4.
> 
> What about other filesystems? Perhaps it makes sense to change
> CURRENT_TIME_SEC instead of adding CURRENT_TIME_SEC_REAL?
> 
> Once again, I am asking. It is not that I suggest to change your patch.

well, the patch is more or less to prove the problem exists and
it could be fixed :) also I'm not sure that all the places using
CURRENT_TIME_SEC suffer the same issue.. 

I'm currenty looking to the code and trying to come up with better
solution.. any ideas are welcome :)


jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-02 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-02  7:41 [PATCH] time/fs - file's time race with vgettimeofday Jiri Olsa
2010-07-02 16:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-02 16:20   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-02 23:58   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2010-07-06 23:03 ` john stultz
2010-07-06 23:11   ` john stultz
2010-07-07 10:47     ` Jiri Olsa
2010-07-07 16:20       ` john stultz
2010-07-07 17:11     ` Jiri Olsa
2010-07-07 17:20       ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100702235836.GA1948@jolsa.Belkin \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox