public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Michael Hennerich <hennerich@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (touchscreen/ad7879)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:17:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100703201706.GA8405@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007020958.05448.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:58:03AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday, July 02, 2010 09:39:44 am Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 16:35:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Changes since 20100630:
> > > 
> > > The tip tree lost a conflict.
> > > 
> > > The driver-core tree gained a conflict agains the jdelvare-hwmon tree.
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---
> > 
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c: In function 'ad7879_probe':
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:487: error: 'struct ad7879' has no
> > member named 'mutex' drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:578: warning:
> > passing argument 1 of 'ad7879_gpio_add' from incompatible pointer type
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:444: note: expected 'struct device *'
> > but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:578: error: too many arguments to
> > function 'ad7879_gpio_add' drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:589:
> > warning: passing argument 1 of 'ad7879_gpio_remove' from incompatible
> > pointer type drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:449: note: expected
> > 'struct device *' but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c: In function 'ad7879_remove':
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:604: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > 'ad7879_gpio_remove' from incompatible pointer type
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c:449: note: expected 'struct device *'
> > but argument is of type 'struct ad7879 *'
> > 
> > 
> > config file is attached.
> > 
> 
> Oops, I will fix that up.
> 
> Thanks for the report Randy.
> 

Should be better now.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-03 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-02  6:35 linux-next: Tree for July 2 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-02 16:39 ` linux-next: Tree for July 2 (touchscreen/ad7879) Randy Dunlap
2010-07-02 16:58   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-07-03 20:17     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2010-07-02 23:44 ` [PATCH -next] staging/solo: add delay.h header Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100703201706.GA8405@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hennerich@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox