From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Aldo Cedillo <aldobrett11@gmail.com>
Cc: kagen101@gmail.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
devel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issues in dt3155_drv.c
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 09:48:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100707004841.GA28188@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingSXbyFclWga9x5aD7MoccCMqhu56PCOVTKHVJ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:25:35PM -0500, Aldo Cedillo wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > index 66db878..f6edd66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > @@ -308,33 +308,42 @@ static void dt3155_isr(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > #endif
> > if (fb->nbuffers > 2) {
> > if (!are_empty_buffers(minor)) {
> > - /* The number of active + locked buffers is
> > - * at most 2, and since there are none empty, there
> > - * must be at least nbuffers-2 ready buffers.
> > - * This is where we 'drop frames', oldest first. */
> > + /* The number of active +
> > + * locked buffers is at most 2,
> > + * and since there are none empty,
> > + * there must be at least nbuffers-2
> > + * ready buffers.
> > + * This is where we 'drop frames',
> > + * oldest first. */
> > push_empty(pop_ready(minor), minor);
> > }
> >
>
> In the CodingStyle in the kernel you can read:
>
> The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
>
> /*
> * This is the preferred style for multi-line
> * comments in the Linux kernel source code.
> * Please use it consistently.
> *
> * Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
> * with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
> */
>
> Again I ask about the coding style because I have seen in many parts of the
> kernel I've seen discrepancies with what is said in the CodingStyle file. So
> I want to get it clear maybe I can help to clean those things.
I believe that you will find both of the following styles in abundance
and that both are acceptable.
/*
* This
* is a multi-line comment
*/
And
/* This
* is a also multi-line comment
*/
Though one may be more acceptable to a given maintainer than the other.
Other variants may also be common and acceptable to some maintainers,
which I suspect is why checkpatch.pl is lenient.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 16:53 [PATCH] Staging: dt3155: fix coding style issues in dt3155_drv.c Joe Eloff
2010-07-06 17:25 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-06 17:37 ` Joe Eloff
2010-07-06 21:20 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-07 0:48 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2010-07-08 16:31 ` Aldo Cedillo
2010-07-08 20:00 ` Greg KH
2010-07-11 9:49 ` Joe Eloff
2010-07-11 14:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100707004841.GA28188@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=aldobrett11@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=kagen101@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox