From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
clemens@ladisch.de, "Siddha,
Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:35:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100707113523.09c2d0e4@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiksRIyTSBWPThUqhG-5-JXpZLlJ87fyxrXuXpbO@mail.gmail.com>
This looks like a different issue, I think the PAT code tracks memtypes
like this.
Suresh, any changes in this area that might explain this?
Jesse
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 14:28:47 +1000
Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this the same or related issue?
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/6/108
> New messages since -rc4, X and graphics really slow after.
>
> [ 1.387013] swapper:1 freeing invalid memtype bf788000-bf789000
> [ 1.387409] swapper:1 freeing invalid memtype bf789000-bf78a000
> [ 5.999675] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0000000-d0040000
> [ 6.068347] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0140000-d0150000
> [ 6.068647] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0150000-d0160000
> [ 6.069661] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0170000-d01f0000
> [ 6.085969] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d01f0000-d0200000
> [ 6.087673] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0210000-d0220000
> [ 6.087900] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0220000-d0230000
> [ 6.088092] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0230000-d0240000
> [ 6.088317] modprobe:548 freeing invalid memtype d0240000-d0250000
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On 07/06/2010 04:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So you want to use pci=override_bios to reallocate all bios assigned resource include
> >>> peer root buses resources and pci bridge resource and pci devices BAR?
> >>
> >> In a perfect world, we'd never need this at all, but sicne that's not
> >> an option, the second-best alternative might be something like the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> pci=override=off # default
> >> pci=override=conflict # override only on conflicts
> >> pci=override=<device> # clear BIOS allocations for <device> (and any
> >> children, if it's a bus)
> >
> > current:
> > if there is conflict, like pci bridge resources or pci devices resources is not in the scope of peer root bus resource range.
> > or pci devices is not in pci bridge resources range.
> > kernel would reject the resource and try to get new range in parent resource for the children.
> >
> > so current default is overriding the conflicts already.
> >
> > Maybe your conflicts have other meaning? like pci bridge resource size is not big enough?
> >
> > or we can have use
> >
> > pci=override=small_bridge
> >
> > or
> >
> > pci=override=bridges
> >
> > instead?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Yinghai
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 21:15 [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources Ram Pai
2010-06-30 22:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-06-30 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-30 23:59 ` Ram Pai
2010-07-02 21:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-06 23:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07 0:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-07 4:28 ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-07 18:35 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-07-07 18:55 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 13:26 ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-09 15:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-09 15:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-07-09 16:00 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100707113523.09c2d0e4@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=andrew.hendry@gmail.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox