Re: [patch 134/149] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

Linus Torvalds
2010-07-13T18:15:36Z

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Well, current upstream uses "m":

Yes, I'd expect current 2.6.34 to also show the same problem.

> and works; I also failed to reproduce with 2.6.32.16.  So I expect some
> toolchain involvement.

And yes, I do believe it's likely a newer gcc that triggers it too,
otherwise we'd have seen more reports of it.

Linus