Re: [patch 134/149] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-27T17:46:24Z

On 07/13/2010 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Well, current upstream uses "m":
> Yes, I'd expect current 2.6.34 to also show the same problem.
>
>> and works; I also failed to reproduce with 2.6.32.16. So I expect some
>> toolchain involvement.
> And yes, I do believe it's likely a newer gcc that triggers it too,
> otherwise we'd have seen more reports of it.

Did anyone get around to doing a proper fix for this? I don't see one
in tip.git or linux-2.6.git. And it needs to get back into stable...

Thanks,
J