From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757968Ab0GGXSX (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2010 19:18:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:50890 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756870Ab0GGXSW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2010 19:18:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:17:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Takeo Tung Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Michal Marek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, sfr@canb.auug.org.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct io panic on raid1 - Re: block: unify flags for struct bio and struct request will kernel panic Message-ID: <20100707231732.GA30007@lst.de> References: <10E8B8D94205471F942B06D2A007832D@TAKEOW7NB1> <4C129778.7040409@suse.cz> <20100612094937.GA12455@lst.de> <1AEF19B8648844C983F583EEBE9C46F4@TAKEOW7NB1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1AEF19B8648844C983F583EEBE9C46F4@TAKEOW7NB1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 07:05:39AM +0800, Takeo Tung wrote: > Dear Christoph, > > I was check the patch again. I found the panic status haapen on Soft RAID > 1. I review it. found some define using bool, so some like ( x & REQ_SYNC) > only 0 or 1. > so if bi_rw = rw | sync will bi_rw = rw | 0 or rw | 1. not rw | ( 1 << > __REQ_SYNC). > > So I write a patch is fix it. seems normal now. could you review the patch > or any comment? The patch looks correct to me, although your mailer mangled the whitespace badly. If Neil wants to keep the flag as bool we could also add a !! around the bit flag checks.