From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: mmap_sem OOM patch
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:11:10 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100708100836.CD1A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100708084005.CD0F.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Yup.
> If admins want to kill memory hogging process manually when the system
> is under heavy swap thrashing, we will face the same problem, need
> unfairness and fast exit. So, unfair exiting design looks very good.
>
> If you will updated the description, I'm glad :)
I have one more topic. can we check fatal_signal_pending() instead TIF_MEMDIE?
As I said, if the process received SIGKILL, do the fork/exec/brk/mmap
starvations have any problem?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-07 23:11 FYI: mmap_sem OOM patch Michel Lespinasse
2010-07-08 0:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 1:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-07-08 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 9:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 9:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <AANLkTimLSnNot2byTWYuIHE8rhGLXbl1zKsQQhmci1Do@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-08 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 10:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 11:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 1:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-12 21:47 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-13 0:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-13 21:08 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <AANLkTimArLPHrxHNEejiXKNYk9To6qsjglbgzyypXP-c@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-08 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100708100836.CD1A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox