public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clemens@ladisch.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port  resources
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:25:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100709082506.514f64ab@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C33CF1C.7020803@kernel.org>

On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:49:32 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> On 07/06/2010 04:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> So you want to use pci=override_bios to reallocate all bios assigned resource include
> >> peer root buses resources and pci bridge resource and pci devices BAR?
> > 
> > In a perfect world, we'd never need this at all, but sicne that's not
> > an option, the second-best alternative might be something like the
> > following:
> > 
> >   pci=override=off # default
> >   pci=override=conflict # override only on conflicts
> >   pci=override=<device> # clear BIOS allocations for <device> (and any
> > children, if it's a bus)
> 
> current:
> if there is conflict, like pci bridge resources or pci devices resources is not in the scope of peer root bus resource range.
> or pci devices is not in pci bridge resources range.
> kernel would reject the resource and try to get new range in parent resource for the children.
> 
> so current default is overriding the conflicts already.
> 
> Maybe your conflicts have other meaning? like pci bridge resource size is not big enough?
> 
> or we can have use
> 
> pci=override=small_bridge
> 
> or 
> 
> pci=override=bridges
> 
> instead?

Changing the default (and fairly old) behavior at this point will
probably cause a lot of trouble; we have machines where reallocating
conflicting or apparently mis-programmed resources is needed.

But we can still add the pci=override= option.  Your patch will need
some changes though; a user needing a specific bus/bridge reallocated
can just pass the bridge id.  And rather than walking its way up,
freeing and trying to re-allocate, it could just free everything below
the given device and let the normal paths allocate it.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-09 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30 21:15 [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources Ram Pai
2010-06-30 22:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-06-30 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-30 23:59   ` Ram Pai
2010-07-02 21:35     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-06 23:13       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 23:58         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07  0:49           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-07  4:28             ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-07 18:35               ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-07 18:55                 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 13:26                   ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-09 15:25             ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2010-07-09 15:50             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-07-09 16:00               ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100709082506.514f64ab@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox