public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: paulus <paulus@samba.org>,
	stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 05/13] perf, powerpc: Convert the FSL driver to use local64_t
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:21:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100709083247.867449426@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100709082117.631541128@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: perf-fsl-fix-local64_t.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3298 bytes --]

For some reason the FSL driver got left out when we converted perf
to use local64_t instead of atomic64_t.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event_fsl_emb.c |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event_fsl_emb.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event_fsl_emb.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event_fsl_emb.c
@@ -162,15 +162,15 @@ static void fsl_emb_pmu_read(struct perf
 	 * Therefore we treat them like NMIs.
 	 */
 	do {
-		prev = atomic64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
+		prev = local64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
 		barrier();
 		val = read_pmc(event->hw.idx);
-	} while (atomic64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.prev_count, prev, val) != prev);
+	} while (local64_cmpxchg(&event->hw.prev_count, prev, val) != prev);
 
 	/* The counters are only 32 bits wide */
 	delta = (val - prev) & 0xfffffffful;
-	atomic64_add(delta, &event->count);
-	atomic64_sub(delta, &event->hw.period_left);
+	local64_add(delta, &event->count);
+	local64_sub(delta, &event->hw.period_left);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -296,11 +296,11 @@ static int fsl_emb_pmu_enable(struct per
 
 	val = 0;
 	if (event->hw.sample_period) {
-		s64 left = atomic64_read(&event->hw.period_left);
+		s64 left = local64_read(&event->hw.period_left);
 		if (left < 0x80000000L)
 			val = 0x80000000L - left;
 	}
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
 	write_pmc(i, val);
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ static void fsl_emb_pmu_unthrottle(struc
 	if (left < 0x80000000L)
 		val = 0x80000000L - left;
 	write_pmc(event->hw.idx, val);
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.period_left, left);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.period_left, left);
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 	perf_enable();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(str
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
 
 	event->hw.last_period = event->hw.sample_period;
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.period_left, event->hw.last_period);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.period_left, event->hw.last_period);
 
 	/*
 	 * See if we need to reserve the PMU.
@@ -541,16 +541,16 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct pe
 	int record = 0;
 
 	/* we don't have to worry about interrupts here */
-	prev = atomic64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
+	prev = local64_read(&event->hw.prev_count);
 	delta = (val - prev) & 0xfffffffful;
-	atomic64_add(delta, &event->count);
+	local64_add(delta, &event->count);
 
 	/*
 	 * See if the total period for this event has expired,
 	 * and update for the next period.
 	 */
 	val = 0;
-	left = atomic64_read(&event->hw.period_left) - delta;
+	left = local64_read(&event->hw.period_left) - delta;
 	if (period) {
 		if (left <= 0) {
 			left += period;
@@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct pe
 	}
 
 	write_pmc(event->hw.idx, val);
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
-	atomic64_set(&event->hw.period_left, left);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, val);
+	local64_set(&event->hw.period_left, left);
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-09  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-09  8:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] perf pmu interface changes -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf, x86: Fix Nehalem PMU quirk Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] sparc64: Fix maybe_change_configuration() PCR setting Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf: Fix CPU hotplug Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf, powerpc: Use perf_sample_data_init() for the FSL code Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:17   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 13:36   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-10 13:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 10:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13] perf pmu interface changes -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 15:11 ` Will Deacon
2010-07-09 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 23:34     ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-09 16:09   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100709083247.867449426@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox