public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clemens@ladisch.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:00:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100709090007.38b0fffc@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007090950.47269.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:50:45 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, July 06, 2010 06:49:32 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On 07/06/2010 04:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So you want to use pci=override_bios to reallocate all bios assigned resource include
> > >> peer root buses resources and pci bridge resource and pci devices BAR?
> > > 
> > > In a perfect world, we'd never need this at all, but sicne that's not
> > > an option, the second-best alternative might be something like the
> > > following:
> > > 
> > >   pci=override=off # default
> > >   pci=override=conflict # override only on conflicts
> > >   pci=override=<device> # clear BIOS allocations for <device> (and any
> > > children, if it's a bus)
> > 
> > current:
> > if there is conflict, like pci bridge resources or pci devices resources is not in the scope of peer root bus resource range.
> > or pci devices is not in pci bridge resources range.
> > kernel would reject the resource and try to get new range in parent resource for the children.
> > 
> > so current default is overriding the conflicts already.
> 
> One conflict we don't handle correctly is when we find a device that
> doesn't fit inside the root bus resources.  We currently disable the
> device, but Windows just leaves it where BIOS put it.
> 
> This causes this bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16263
> It should be fairly simple to make Linux handle this conflict the same
> way, without requiring any special kernel arguments.

Sounds reasonable.  I'm open to suggestions on alternate approaches for
this issue as well.

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

      reply	other threads:[~2010-07-09 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30 21:15 [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI: skip release and reallocation of io port resources Ram Pai
2010-06-30 22:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-06-30 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-30 23:59   ` Ram Pai
2010-07-02 21:35     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-06 23:13       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 23:58         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-07  0:49           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-07  4:28             ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-07 18:35               ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-07 18:55                 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 13:26                   ` Andrew Hendry
2010-07-09 15:25             ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-09 15:50             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-07-09 16:00               ` Jesse Barnes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100709090007.38b0fffc@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox