Re: [PATCH v2] pm: Add runtime PM statistics

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>]

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:26:07 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> > +
> >  static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_usage, 0444, rtpm_usagecount_show,
> > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_kids, 0444,
> > rtpm_children_show, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_status, 0444,
> > rtpm_status_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_active_time,
> > 0444, rtpm_active_time_show, NULL); +static
> > DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_suspended_time, 0444, rtpm_suspended_time_show,
> > NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(runtime_enabled, 0444, rtpm_enabled_show,
> > NULL);
> 
> On a second thought, "active_time" and "suspended_time" should be
> sufficient (ie. the "runtime_" prefix is not really necessary).

it's not necessary but it's consistent with the others... so yes
I can change it but then it's no longer consistent naming.. are you sure
you want this changed?


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org