Re: [patch 1/2] x86_64 page fault NMI-safe

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:14:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >>  NMI entry:
> >
> > I think at this point [NMI re-entry] we've corrupted the top of the NMI kernel
> > stack already, due to entering via the IST stack mechanism, which is
> > non-nesting and which enters at the same point - right?
> 
> Yeah, you're right, but we could easily fix that up. We know we don't
> need any stack for the nested case, so all we would need to do is to
> just subtract a small bit off %rsp, and copy the three words or so to
> create a "new" stack for the non-nested case.
> 
> > We could solve that by copying that small stack frame off before entering the
> > 'generic' NMI routine - but it all feels a bit pulled in by the hair.
> 
> Why? It's much cleaner than making the _real_ codepaths much worse.



There is also the fact we need to handle the lost NMI, by defering its
treatment or so. That adds even more complexity.