Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 27/30] rcu: apply ->rda changes to rcutree_trace.c

[Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:10:01PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The print_rcu_pendings() function used the ->rda[] array, so this
> commit makes it instead use per_cpu_ptr().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree_trace.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> index 36c95b4..458e032 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp;
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -		rdp = rsp->rda[cpu];
> +		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
>  		if (rdp->beenonline)
>  			print_one_rcu_pending(m, rdp);
>  	}

For the final version of this patchset, this should get squashed into
the previous patch, right?  Otherwise, the state after the previous
patch but before this one won't compile.

- Josh Triplett