From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932068Ab0GOArd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:47:33 -0400 Received: from bld-mail14.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.99]:36473 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757910Ab0GOArb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:47:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:46:39 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 7 Message-ID: <20100715004639.GG30737@dastard> References: <20100707165539.957e7d1c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100707172136.3658fb17.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100714152042.5b83f03b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100715094513.8941fa25.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100714172741.f520b7a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100714172741.f520b7a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:27:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:45:13 +1000 > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, Al, > > > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:42 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Bug is still there. Reverting ""Make ->drop_inode() just return > > > whether inode needs to be dropped" makes it go away. > > > > > > Al, please don't just dump crap in linux-next and then ignore bug reports. > > > People are trying to get work done here. > > > > I will revert that commit in linux-next today if it is still there (and > > not fixed). > > Reverting the patch didn't help - the patch moved the BUG_ON() from > generic_delete_inode() into __iput_final(). With the patch reverted > the kernel still goes BUG over the same test in generic_delete_inode(). > > It could be that the bug was caused by fs-writeback.c changes. David, > do you have time to take a look at this? I'll have a look at it. What filesystem(s) are you seeing this on? Any particular workload that triggers it? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com