From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932779Ab0GOI7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:59:36 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:44996 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932652Ab0GOI7f (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:59:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:59:32 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Tejun Heo , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] sound/alsa/soc/codec: fix memory leak and resource relaim in error path Message-ID: <20100715085932.GA23529@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1279162147.29294.2.camel@mola> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1279162147.29294.2.camel@mola> X-Cookie: There's only one everything. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:49:07AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > [PATCH 1/12] ad1836: fix a memory leak if another ad1836 is registered > [PATCH 2/12] ak4642: fix a memory leak if failed to initialise AK4642 > [PATCH 3/12] da7210: fix a memory leak if failed to initialise da7210 audio codec > [PATCH 4/12] wm8523: fix resource reclaim in wm8523_register error path > [PATCH 5/12] wm8711: fix a memory leak if another WM8711 is registered > [PATCH 6/12] wm8904: fix resource reclaim in wm8904_register error path > [PATCH 7/12] wm8940: fix resource reclaim in wm8940_register error path > [PATCH 8/12] wm8955: fix resource reclaim in wm8955_register error path > [PATCH 9/12] wm8961: fix resource reclaim in wm8961_register error path > [PATCH 10/12] wm8974: fix a memory leak if another WM8974 is registered > [PATCH 11/12] wm8978: fix a memory leak if another WM8978 is registered > [PATCH 12/12] wm9081: fix resource reclaim in wm9081_register error path If you're going to be submiting large batches of small patches like this it would be really helpful if you could make sure you format the subject lines for your patches so that they match the standards for the area of the kernel you're updating. This makes them much easier to apply.