public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@gmail.com>,
	Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	lists@wildgooses.com, davidsen@tmr.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raise initial congestion window size / speedup slow start?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:48:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100715134857.38d519c5@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3F66BA.8010002@hp.com>

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:51:22 -0700
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:

> I have to wonder if the only heuristic one could employ for divining the initial 
> congestion window is to be either pessimistic/conservative or 
> optimistic/liberal.  Or for that matter the only one one really needs here?
> 
> That's what it comes down to doesn't it?  At any one point in time, we don't 
> *really* know the state of the network and whether it can handle the load we 
> might wish to put upon it.  We are always reacting to it. Up until now, it has 
> been felt necessary to be pessimistic/conservative at time of connection 
> establishment and not rely as much on the robustness of the "control" part of 
> avoidance and control.
> 
> Now, the folks at Google have lots of data to suggest we don't need to be so 
> pessimistic/conservative and so we have to decide if we are willing to be more 
> optimistic/liberal.  Broadly handwaving, the "netdev we" seems to be willing to 
> be more optimistic/liberal in at least a few cases, and the question comes down 
> to whether or not the "IETF we" will be similarly willing.

I am not convinced that a host being aggressive with initial cwnd (Linux) would
not end up unfairly monopolizing available bandwidth compared to older more conservative
implementations (Windows). Whether fairness is important or not is another debate.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-15 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-14 10:43 Raise initial congestion window size / speedup slow start? Ed W
2010-07-14 11:58 ` Alan Cox
2010-07-14 15:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-14 18:15   ` David Miller
2010-07-14 18:48     ` Ed W
2010-07-14 19:10       ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-07-14 21:47         ` Mitchell Erblich
2010-07-14 20:17       ` Rick Jones
2010-07-14 20:39         ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-14 21:55           ` David Miller
2010-07-14 22:13             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-14 22:19               ` Rick Jones
2010-07-14 22:40                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-14 22:52               ` Ed W
2010-07-14 23:01                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-14 23:05                   ` Ed W
2010-07-15  3:49               ` Bill Fink
2010-07-15  5:29                 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-15 19:51                   ` Rick Jones
2010-07-15 20:48                     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-07-16  0:23                       ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-16  9:03                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-15 10:33               ` Alan Cox
2010-07-14 22:05           ` Ed W
2010-07-14 22:36             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-14 23:01               ` Ed W
2010-07-15  4:12           ` Tom Herbert
2010-07-15  7:48             ` Ed W
2010-07-15 17:36               ` Jerry Chu
2010-07-15  5:09           ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-15  2:52     ` Bill Fink
2010-07-15  4:51     ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-16 17:01       ` Patrick McManus
2010-07-16 17:41         ` Ed W
2010-07-17  1:23           ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-17  0:36         ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-19 17:08           ` Rick Jones
2010-07-19 22:51             ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2010-07-19 23:42               ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-07-15 23:14     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-14 18:32   ` Ed W
2010-07-15 15:10     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-16  2:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100715134857.38d519c5@nehalam \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=hkjerry.chu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox