From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b43 wireless driver inhibits access to /dev/hwrng
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:31:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723153101.GA12795@darkside.kls.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723143219.GA2426@tuxdriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1714 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:32:19AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> The hwrng driver is provided by the b43 hardware, which is shutdown
> when the network interface is down. I'm not sure how one could expect
> this to work.
Nope. It's provided by the VIA PadLock hardware (through the via-rng
driver). I'm not sure how one could expect this not to work when the
network interface provided by the b43 driver is down.
Well, maybe let's try to become a bit less offensive... :)
Probably there are two Hardware RNGs on that machine: one provided by
VIA PadLock through via-rng, one provided by BCM4312 through b43:
hw_random/via-rng.c: err = hwrng_register(&via_rng);
b43/main.c: err = hwrng_register(&wl->rng);
But at least now it's a bit more likely that the problem is located in
the rng core which should not render /dev/hwrng inaccessible when only
one of the RNGs unregisters.
However, what I don't fully understand is: I find only one way where b43
unregisters its RNG, which is via
b43_remove() -> b43_rng_exit() -> hwrng_unregister()
And, I'm really not sure if I got this right, but... I guess,
b43_remove() is only called when the module is removed from the kernel
and not when the network interface is shut down.
So, maybe it's not really rng core's fault?
I guess, b43 just stops delivering data through b43_rng_read() when the
hardware is shut down and instead returns ENODEV (which is btw. what I
get when I'm trying to read /dev/hwrng while b43 is down), and the rng
core just delivers this error up when it's trying to deliver the read
request to the b43 RNG.
Mario
--
User sind wie ideale Gase - sie verteilen sich gleichmaessig ueber alle Platten
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 22:52 b43 wireless driver inhibits access to /dev/hwrng Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-23 14:32 ` John W. Linville
2010-07-23 15:31 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [this message]
2010-07-23 17:32 ` John W. Linville
2010-07-23 18:21 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-31 6:15 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723153101.GA12795@darkside.kls.lan \
--to=mario.holbe@tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox