From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: don't allow aliased requests to starve others
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:17:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100723161702.GC13104@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49pqyejkyo.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:07:11AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
[..]
> >> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> >> index 7982b83..0d8d2cd 100644
> >> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> >> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> >> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline int cfqg_busy_async_queues(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void cfq_dispatch_insert(struct request_queue *, struct request *);
> >> +static struct request *cfq_check_fifo(struct cfq_queue *cfqq);
> >> static struct cfq_queue *cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *, bool,
> >> struct io_context *, gfp_t);
> >> static struct cfq_io_context *cfq_cic_lookup(struct cfq_data *,
> >> @@ -1394,10 +1395,22 @@ static void cfq_add_rq_rb(struct request *rq)
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * looks a little odd, but the first insert might return an alias.
> >> - * if that happens, put the alias on the dispatch list
> >> + * If that happens, put the alias on the dispatch list, but don't
> >> + * allow issuing of aliased requests to starve out the queue.
> >> */
> >> - while ((__alias = elv_rb_add(&cfqq->sort_list, rq)) != NULL)
> >> + while ((__alias = elv_rb_add(&cfqq->sort_list, rq)) != NULL) {
> >> + int fifo_checked = cfq_cfqq_fifo_expire(cfqq);
> >> + struct request *__rq;
> >> +
> >> cfq_dispatch_insert(cfqd->queue, __alias);
> >> + cfq_clear_cfqq_fifo_expire(cfqq);
> >> + while ((__rq = cfq_check_fifo(cfqq))) {
> >> + cfq_dispatch_insert(cfqd->queue, __rq);
> >> + cfq_clear_cfqq_fifo_expire(cfqq);
> >> + }
> >> + if (fifo_checked)
> >> + cfq_mark_cfqq_fifo_expire(cfqq);
> >> + }
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > IIUC correctly upon receiving an alias, you are checking fifo of same
> > cfqq and not the fifo of other cfqqs which are blocked. So dispatching
> > more expired requests from the cfqq which is generating lots of aliases
> > can at best only worsen the problem. I am wondering how does this patch
> > help in dispatching requests from other cfqqs.
>
> I think you're missing a key element, here. Let's assume some harmless
> process has the I/O scheduler. Then, your pathological alias generator
> process comes in and inserts a request into the queue. If that request
> is an alias, then it gets moved to the dispatch list immediately, even
> though the cfqq for that process is not currently being served.
>
> Now, I'm not sure why we ever get back into select_queue if the request
> queue is always full of these aliases. I didn't dig down that far, but
> I did verify that progress was made in my simple reproducer.
Jeff, I do understand the problem here. Just that I don't understand
how this patch is going to fix it for CFQ. How this patch will make
sure that requests from other starved queue are put onto dispatch queue.
Also I have been trying to reproduce the issue with 2.6.36-rc6 kernel
and have not been successful so far.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 15:09 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: don't allow aliased requests to starve others Jeff Moyer
2010-07-14 19:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-07-23 4:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-07-23 15:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-07-23 16:17 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2010-07-24 9:30 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-24 8:04 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-24 10:03 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-26 13:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-02 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100723161702.GC13104@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox