From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754766Ab0GZQ5O (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:57:14 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28417 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754592Ab0GZQ5N (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:57:13 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:51:14 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/3] vhost: replace vhost_workqueue with
 per-vhost kthread
Message-ID: <20100726165114.GA27353@redhat.com>
References: <4C06A580.9060300@kernel.org>
 <20100722155840.GA1743@redhat.com>
 <4C48B664.9000109@kernel.org>
 <20100724191447.GA4972@redhat.com>
 <4C4BEAA2.6040301@kernel.org>
 <20100726152510.GA26223@redhat.com>
 <4C4DAB14.5050809@kernel.org>
 <20100726155014.GA26412@redhat.com>
 <4C4DB247.9060709@kernel.org>
 <4C4DB466.6000409@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C4DB466.6000409@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Just one more thing.

I noticed that with vhost, flush_work was getting the worker
pointer as well. Can we live with this API change?

-- 
MST