From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753997Ab0G1BdH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:33:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7207 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752204Ab0G1BdC (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:33:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:27:35 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Sridhar Samudrala Cc: netdev , lkml , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , dlstevens@us.ibm.com Subject: vhost mergeable buffers guest's cgroup Message-ID: <20100728012735.GA23243@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sridhar, David, I pushed a mergeable buffers patchset on my vhost-net-next branch, on top of the threading changes. This is a minimal patch, which in my testing has zero impact on non-mergeable path. Please give this a spin and let me know. Thanks! -- MST