From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, bharata@in.ibm.com,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirt-spinlock implementation for KVM guests (Version 0)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:10:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728221059.GA32739@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100726061150.GB21699@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:41:50AM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> This patch-series implements paravirt-spinlock implementation for KVM guests,
> based heavily on Xen's implementation. I tried to refactor Xen's spinlock
> implementation to make it common for both Xen and KVM - but found that
> few differences between Xen and KVM (Xen has the ability to block on a
> particular event/irq for example) _and_ the fact that the guest kernel
> can be compiled to support both Xen and KVM hypervisors (CONFIG_XEN and
> CONFIG_KVM_GUEST can both be turned on) makes the "common" code a eye-sore.
> There will have to be:
>
> if (xen) {
> ...
> } else if (kvm) {
> ..
> }
>
> or possibly:
>
> alternative(NOP, some_xen_specific_call, ....)
Why not utilize the pvops path?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 6:11 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirt-spinlock implementation for KVM guests (Version 0) Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-07-26 6:13 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] Debugfs support for reading an array of u32-type integers Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-07-26 6:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] Add yield hypercall for KVM guests Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-07-26 17:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-28 14:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-02 8:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-03 5:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-03 5:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-02 8:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 14:42 ` Ryan Harper
2010-08-02 14:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 15:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-26 6:15 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] Paravirtualized spinlock implementation " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-08-02 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 15:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-03 6:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-03 17:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-08-02 8:53 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-26 6:16 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] Add yield hypercall support in Qemu Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-07-26 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirt-spinlock implementation for KVM guests (Version 0) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-28 14:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-07-28 22:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2010-07-28 22:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-08-02 8:50 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100728221059.GA32739@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox