From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [bug] Fixing mutex_lock() under held spinlock
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:22:23 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100729132223.GA19715@albatros> (raw)
Hi,
I've found that cfi_cmdset and lpddr_cmds call mutex_lock() under held
spinlock(). Maybe it was designed as a special locking scheme, so I
don't try to fix it as I might create new complex locking problem.
--- ./drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c 2010-07-06 16:45:43.000000000 +0400
+++ /tmp/cocci-output-8818-2d9c62-cfi_cmdset_0001.c 2010-07-29 16:30:47.000000000 +0400
@@ -959,14 +959,12 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *ma
if (chip->priv) {
struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
- spin_lock(&shared->lock);
if (shared->writing == chip && chip->oldstate == FL_READY) {
/* We own the ability to write, but we're done */
shared->writing = shared->erasing;
if (shared->writing && shared->writing != chip) {
/* give back ownership to who we loaned it from */
struct flchip *loaner = shared->writing;
- mutex_lock(&loaner->mutex);
spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
put_chip(map, loaner, loaner->start);
--- ./drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr_cmds.c 2010-07-06 16:45:43.000000000 +0400
+++ /tmp/cocci-output-8953-56b3dd-lpddr_cmds.c 2010-07-29 16:30:57.000000000 +0400
@@ -348,14 +348,12 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *ma
{
if (chip->priv) {
struct flchip_shared *shared = chip->priv;
- spin_lock(&shared->lock);
if (shared->writing == chip && chip->oldstate == FL_READY) {
/* We own the ability to write, but we're done */
shared->writing = shared->erasing;
if (shared->writing && shared->writing != chip) {
/* give back the ownership */
struct flchip *loaner = shared->writing;
- mutex_lock(&loaner->mutex);
spin_unlock(&shared->lock);
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
put_chip(map, loaner);
thanks,
Vasiliy
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 13:22 Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-07-29 13:34 ` [bug] Fixing mutex_lock() under held spinlock Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100729132223.GA19715@albatros \
--to=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox