From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [115/165] ext4: check s_log_groups_per_flex in online resize code
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:15:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100730171510.018458238@clark.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100730171550.GA1299@kroah.com
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
commit 42007efd569f1cf3bfb9a61da60ef6c2179508ca upstream (as of v2.6.34-git13)
If groups_per_flex < 2, sbi->s_flex_groups[] doesn't get filled out,
and every other access to this first tests s_log_groups_per_flex;
same thing needs to happen in resize or we'll wander off into
a null pointer when doing an online resize of the file system.
Thanks to Christoph Biedl, who came up with the trivial testcase:
# truncate --size 128M fsfile
# mkfs.ext3 -F fsfile
# tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index,flex_bg,huge_file,dir_nlink,extra_isize fsfile
# e2fsck -yDf -C0 fsfile
# truncate --size 132M fsfile
# losetup /dev/loop0 fsfile
# mount /dev/loop0 mnt
# resize2fs -p /dev/loop0
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13549
Reported-by: Alessandro Polverini <alex@nibbles.it>
Test-case-by: Christoph Biedl <bugzilla.kernel.bpeb@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/ext4/resize.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -930,7 +930,8 @@ int ext4_group_add(struct super_block *s
percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter,
EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb));
- if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG)) {
+ if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG) &&
+ sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
ext4_group_t flex_group;
flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, input->group);
atomic_add(input->free_blocks_count,
reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100730171510.018458238@clark.site \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox