public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Additional fix : (was [v2]printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:44:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100802154434.5615bcf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB02C5DB6D1F@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:22:26 +0530
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have faced similar issue as what is being described in below with
> latest kernel.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/103347/
> 
> When a secondary CPU is being brought up, it is not uncommon for
> printk() to be invoked when cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) == 0.  The
> case that I witnessed personally was on MIPS:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/30/4
> 
> If (can_use_console() == 0), printk() will spool its output to log_buf
> and it will be visible in "dmesg", but that output will NOT be echoed to
> the console until somebody calls release_console_sem() from a CPU that
> is online.  Therefore, the boot time messages from the new CPU can get
> stuck in "limbo" for a long time, and might suddenly appear on the
> screen when a completely unrelated event (e.g. "eth0: link is down")
> occurs.
> 
> This patch modifies the console code so that any pending messages are
> automatically flushed out to the console whenever a CPU hotplug
> operation completes successfully or aborts.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> 
> Above patch fixes only half of the problem. I mean the cpu online
> path prints are coming on the console.
> 
> But similar problem also exist if there are prints in the cpu offline
> path. I got that fixed by adding below patch on top of you patch.
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
> index d370b74..f4d7352 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -982,6 +982,9 @@ static int __cpuinit console_cpu_notify(struct notifier_bloc
>         switch (action) {
>         case CPU_ONLINE:
>         case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> +       case CPU_DEAD:
> +       case CPU_DYING:
> +       case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
>                 if (try_acquire_console_sem() == 0)
>                         release_console_sem();
>         }

The patch lacked a suitable title.  I called it "console: flush log
messages for more cpu-hotplug events".

The patch lacks a Signed-off-by:.  Please send one.

The patch has its tabs replaced with spaces.  I fixed that.  Please
reconfigure your email client for next time.

The code which is being patch has changed.  It now does

                acquire_console_sem();
                release_console_sem();

so the code may no longer work - perhaps it now deadlocks (unlikely). 
Please retest?

Finally, I don't understand the patch :( Who is sending out CPU_DEAD,
CPU_DYING or CPU_DOWN_FAILED events during kernel boot?  I'd have
thought that those events simply aren't occurring, and that the patch
has no effect.  Confused - please explain further.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-02 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-29  8:52 Additional fix : (was [v2]printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events) Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-08-02 22:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-03  7:33   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-08-03 15:24     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-08-03 16:53       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-08-03 23:59     ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-04  3:30       ` Paul Mundt
2010-08-04 13:51         ` Ralf Baechle
2010-08-04 15:23           ` Ralf Baechle
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-01  4:27 Shilimkar, Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100802154434.5615bcf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox