public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: rounddown helper function
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:35:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804143504.e7dfade1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100803112354.8761e49d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:54 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:16:07 -0400 Eric Paris wrote:
> 
> > The roundup() helper function will round a given value up to a multiple of
> > another given value.  aka  roundup(11, 7) would give 14 = 7 * 2.  This new
> > function does the opposite.  It will round a given number down to the
> > nearest multiple of the second number: rounddown(11, 7) would give 7.
> > 
> > I need this in some future SELinux code and can carry the macro myself, but
> > figured I would put it in the core kernel so others might find and use it
> > if need be.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/linux/kernel.h |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 7d5b10f..d6092fd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
> >  #define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
> >  #define DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d) (((n) + (d) - 1) / (d))
> >  #define roundup(x, y) ((((x) + ((y) - 1)) / (y)) * (y))
> > +#define rounddown(x, y) ((x) - ((x) % (y)))
> >  #define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, divisor)(			\
> >  {							\
> >  	typeof(divisor) __divisor = divisor;		\
> > 
> > --
> 
> I'm more used to seeing it like
> 
> #define DIV_ROUND_DOWN(n, d)	(((n) / (d)) * (d))
> 
> but since multiply/divide/modulus are usually slower, your (SELinux) way is better,
> I suppose.
> 
> and the usual caveats apply:  don't use these macros with expressions (nor with y
> or d == 0).

Yes, it really shouldn't reference its argument twice.  And that's easy
to fix.

A fancy version would detect constant-power-of-two and do an `& (d - 1)'
instead of the modulus.  But probably the compiler does optimisatons in
that case - for unsigned types, at least.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-04 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-03 18:16 [PATCH] kernel: rounddown helper function Eric Paris
2010-08-03 18:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-08-04 21:35   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-08-05 17:56     ` Eric Paris
2010-08-05 19:03       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100804143504.e7dfade1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox