From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759284Ab0HETG7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:47208 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755203Ab0HETGx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:06:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:01:38 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Jeff Moyer Cc: Dominik Brodowski , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, josef@redhat.com, Michael Monnerie , Christoph Hellwig , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: direct-io regression [Was: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs] Message-ID: <20100805190138.GV29846@think> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Mason , Jeff Moyer , Dominik Brodowski , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, josef@redhat.com, Michael Monnerie , Christoph Hellwig , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com References: <20100804085039.GA11671@infradead.org> <20100804091317.GA27779@isilmar-3.linta.de> <20100804092122.GA2998@infradead.org> <20100804073546.GA7494@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <201008041116.09822@zmi.at> <20100804102526.GB13766@isilmar-3.linta.de> <15446.1280953986@localhost> <20100805093100.GA3001@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20100805113240.GA29846@think> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4C5B0BB1.01E8:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:58:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Chris Mason writes: > > > But, I'm surprised your drive is doing 8K dio reads at 16MB/s, that > > seems a little high. > > I'm not sure why you think that. We're talking about a plain old SATA > disk, right? I can get 40-50MB/s on my systems for 8KB O_DIRECT reads. > What am I missing? Clearly I'm wrong, his drive is going much faster ;) I expect the smaller reads to be slower but the drive's internal cache is doing well. -chris