From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754907Ab0HIUs6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:48:58 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:55882 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754214Ab0HIUs5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:48:57 -0400 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Organization: IBM - LTC To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] v5 Update memory-hotplug documentation Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:48:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-24-preempt; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki References: <4C60407C.2080608@austin.ibm.com> <4C604C62.7060509@austin.ibm.com> <201008091344.37878.nacc@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201008091344.37878.nacc@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008091348.42256.nacc@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, August 09, 2010 01:44:37 pm Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On Monday, August 09, 2010 11:43:46 am Nathan Fontenot wrote: > > Update the memory hotplug documentation to reflect the new behaviors of > > memory blocks reflected in sysfs. > > > > > Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt 2010-08-09 07:36:48.000000000 -0500 > > +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt 2010-08-09 07:59:54.000000000 -0500 > > > > > -/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/phys_index > > +/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/start_phys_index > > +/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/end_phys_index > > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/phys_device > > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state > > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/removable > > > > -'phys_index' : read-only and contains section id, same as XXX. > > > > > +'phys_index' : read-only and contains section id of the first section > > Shouldn't this be "start_phys_index"? Ah, actually it's that the Documentation change doesn't seem to agree with patch 2/8 ? That is, 2/8 leaves phys_index in place, but changes several variables, while this patch indicates its removal? Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan Linux Technology Center