From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:31:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100816013109.GS10165@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim8U87uZ73BcFc42O6EFWuNkA5UjhhiNeVLtAWT@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:16 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > I guess my real question was "is this something IA64 could benefit from
> > and/or could we make the IA64 code more similar to the x86 bits"?
>
> If Eric's recollection about the "weird floating point fixup routines"[1]
> performance issues are correct - then ia64 won't want to do this.
I proposed something similar to this for ia64 at one point to solve the
problem of kexecing to Xen - which at that time mapped EFI to a different
location to Linux.
As I recall, the idea was shot-down by SGI Altix people on the basis
potential performance problems. I don't recall any reasons more specific
than that being given (and to be honest I was less than happy about
it at the time).
In the end I moved EFI in Xen to match Linux and have been able to ignore
the problem ever since. Though as Eric pointed out elsewhere in this
thread, there is ample scope for incompatibilities with future/other
kernels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-16 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-13 19:18 [PATCH][EFI] Run EFI in physical mode Takao Indoh
2010-08-13 22:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-16 19:30 ` Takao Indoh
2010-08-13 22:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 22:33 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-13 23:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-13 23:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-13 23:36 ` Tony Luck
2010-08-16 1:31 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2010-08-13 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16 1:43 ` huang ying
2010-08-16 3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16 4:58 ` huang ying
2010-08-16 5:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-16 23:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-16 23:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100816013109.GS10165@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox