From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:42:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100817144237.GB14091@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723072301.GC23461@elte.hu>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:23:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * ykzhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > From the above description maybe the E820_ACPI region can be mapped as
> > cached. But this still depends on the BIOS. If the some shared data resides
> > in the E820_ACPI region on some BIOS, maybe we can't map the E820_ACPI
> > region as cached again.
>
> I dont think we can do this safely unless some other OS (Windows) does it as
> well. (the reason is that if some BIOS messes this up then it will cause nasty
> bugs/problems only on Linux.)
>
> But the benefits of caching are very clear and well measured by Jack, so we
> want the feature. What we can do is to add an exception for 'known good' hw
> vendors - i.e. something quite close to Jack's RFC patch, but implemented a
> bit more cleanly:
>
> Exposing x86_platform and e820 details to generic ACPI code isnt particularly
> clean - there should be an ACPI accessor function for that or so: a new
> acpi_table_can_be_cached(table) function or so.
Agree. I am looking for the right set of abstractions for this.
>
> In fact since __acpi_map_table(addr,size) is defined by architectures already,
> this could be done purely within x86 code.
No. Unfortunately the function __acpi_map_tables() is not called on the
path that does the permanent mappings. The code is (somewhat simplified):
drivers/acpi/osl.c:
acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
{
if (acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap)
return ioremap((unsigned long)phys, size);
else
return __acpi_map_table((unsigned long)phys, size);
}
Early in boot before "acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap" is set, __acpi_map_table()
is called to map tables. __acpi_map_table() calls early_iomap() and all
early mappings are subsequently unmapped.
For the permanent mappings, we need a way to make the acpi code call
ioremap_cache() instead of ioremap() for all tables that are actually
in WB memory.
Timings made during boot show only a small benefit __acpi_map_table()
mapping tables cacheable. (I didn't check, but perhaps the early mapping
are only checking table IDs - not the full table).
The performance benefit of WB is for the permanent mapping made after
acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap is set. For some reason, most of the time
consuming references occur after this point. In addition ALL offnode
references occur after this point.
--- jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 15:22 [RFC] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED Jack Steiner
2010-07-22 15:52 ` Len Brown
2010-07-23 16:38 ` Jack Steiner
2010-07-23 1:46 ` ykzhao
2010-07-23 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-23 14:26 ` ykzhao
2010-08-17 14:45 ` Jack Steiner
2010-08-17 15:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-17 14:42 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2010-08-17 14:39 ` Jack Steiner
2010-07-24 0:14 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-24 0:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-07-24 12:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-08-17 14:49 ` Jack Steiner
2010-08-17 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-24 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-26 17:17 ` [RFC - V2] " Jack Steiner
2010-08-26 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-08 21:22 ` Jack Steiner
2010-12-09 1:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-09 3:50 ` Jack Steiner
2010-12-09 6:12 ` Len Brown
2010-08-17 15:59 ` [RFC] " Jack Steiner
2010-08-26 17:47 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100817144237.GB14091@sgi.com \
--to=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox