From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [3/6] x86: dont send SIGBUS for kernel page faults
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:01:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100818150557.358157671@clark.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100818150615.GA4752@kroah.com>
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
Based on commit 96054569190bdec375fe824e48ca1f4e3b53dd36 upstream,
authored by Linus Torvalds.
This is my backport to the .27 kernel tree, hopefully preserving
the same functionality.
Original commit message:
It's wrong for several reasons, but the most direct one is that the
fault may be for the stack accesses to set up a previous SIGBUS. When
we have a kernel exception, the kernel exception handler does all the
fixups, not some user-level signal handler.
Even apart from the nested SIGBUS issue, it's also wrong to give out
kernel fault addresses in the signal handler info block, or to send a
SIGBUS when a system call already returns EFAULT.
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_r
unsigned long address;
int write, si_code;
int fault;
+ int should_exit_no_context = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
unsigned long flags;
#endif
@@ -876,6 +877,9 @@ no_context:
oops_end(flags, regs, SIGKILL);
#endif
+ if (should_exit_no_context)
+ return;
+
/*
* We ran out of memory, or some other thing happened to us that made
* us unable to handle the page fault gracefully.
@@ -901,8 +905,11 @@ do_sigbus:
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die */
- if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
+ if (!(error_code & PF_USER)) {
+ should_exit_no_context = 1;
goto no_context;
+ }
+
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/* User space => ok to do another page fault */
if (is_prefetch(regs, address, error_code))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-18 15:06 [0/6] 2.6.27.52 stable review [try 3] Greg KH
2010-08-18 15:01 ` [1/6] mm: keep a guard page below a grow-down stack segment Greg KH
2010-08-18 15:01 ` [2/6] mm: fix missing page table unmap for stack guard page failure case Greg KH
2010-08-18 15:01 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-08-18 15:01 ` [4/6] mm: pass correct mm when growing stack Greg KH
2010-08-18 15:01 ` [5/6] mm: fix page table unmap for stack guard page properly Greg KH
2010-08-18 15:02 ` [6/6] mm: fix up some user-visible effects of the stack guard page Greg KH
2010-08-19 1:18 ` [0/6] 2.6.27.52 stable review [try 3] Gabor Z. Papp
2010-08-19 14:24 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-08-23 22:44 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100818150557.358157671@clark.site \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox