From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:09:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008191309.15425.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6C3910.80800@codeaurora.org>
On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> So the only sticking point now is that x86, parisc, and arm use warnings
> and errors but s390 only uses warnings. I guess I'll reword it to be:
>
> Enabling this option turns a certain set of sanity checks for
> user copy operations into compile time warnings/errors.
>
> The copy_from_user() etc checks are there to help test if there
> are sufficient security checks on the length argument of the
> copy operation, by having gcc prove that the argument is
> within bounds.
>
> If unsure, or if you run an older (pre 4.4) gcc where this
> option is a no-op, say N.
>
> or I'll add a patch to make s390 trigger an error when this is enabled?
(Taking Martin and Heiko on Cc for s390)
I'd strongly suggest making the behavior the same for everyone. It should
be fairly easy to make sure none of these warnings ever triggers
on s390, because most of the Linux device driver code does not get build
there anyway.
I'd also drop the part about old compilers and just say
"If unsure, say N".
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 3:02 [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks Stephen Boyd
2010-08-10 22:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-10 22:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-11 0:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-18 1:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Boyd
2010-08-18 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-18 19:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 11:09 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-08-24 15:06 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-24 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-24 15:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-25 12:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-25 12:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-25 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-25 14:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-28 1:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-28 7:43 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-28 9:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-04 4:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-14 3:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-14 8:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-09-14 13:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-09-14 14:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-08-19 2:28 ` [PATCHv2 2/1] Consolidate CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 4:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-08-19 4:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-19 11:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-11 3:04 ` [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-11 18:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-08-12 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008191309.15425.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox